[Freeipa-users] Accident upgrade 3.3 to 4.1

thierry bordaz tbordaz at redhat.com
Wed Apr 8 12:35:30 UTC 2015


On 04/08/2015 02:19 PM, Alexander Frolushkin wrote:
>>> On one of accidently upgraded server I have following error in dirsrv logs:
>>>
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:24:12 +0300] connection - conn=1095 fd=131 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:24:12 +0300] connection - conn=1094 fd=124 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:24:12 +0300] connection - conn=1096 fd=124 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:24:12 +0300] connection - conn=1097 fd=131 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
>> This message is logged if the received message was too large. But here max size was 200Mb.
>> I can not imagine a such large message.
>> Being log at the same second, it could be transient error. Have you seen others messages like these ?
> Yes, it still here.
>
> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:01 +0300] connection - conn=1125 fd=130 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:01 +0300] connection - conn=1124 fd=126 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.
> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:01 +0300] connection - conn=1126 fd=126 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 209715200 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase.

Those logs mean the connection (e.g. conn=1125) got closed.
Would you grep conn=1125 in access log ?

> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:26 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://cnt-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:26 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://cnt-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
> [08/Apr/2015:14:55:26 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://cnt-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>
>
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:25:11 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://sib-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:25:11 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://sib-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:25:11 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://sib-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:25:15 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://vlg-rhidm02.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>>> [08/Apr/2015:13:25:15 +0300] attrlist_replace - attr_replace (nsslapd-referral, ldap://vlg-rhidm02.unix.ad.com:389/o%3Dipaca) failed.
>> Here it is likely trigger by RUV containing duplicated values (multiple replica install ?). You may have to use cleanruv after the upgrade.
>> ipa-replica-manage list-ruv  and ipa-replica-manager clean-ruv
> Do You mean we need to upgrade all 3.3.3 IPA servers to 4.1 first? Or this can be cleaned right now on remaining servers?
>
> BTW:
> # ipa-replica-manage list-ruv
> Directory Manager password:
>
> sib-rhidm03.unix.ad.com:389: 5
> dv-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389: 17
> sib-rhidm02.unix.ad.com:389: 3
> sib-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389: 4
> url-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389: 6
> url-rhidm02.unix.ad.com:389: 7
> ....
> nw-rhidm01.unix.ad.com:389: 19
>

This message is harmless. It means that some values of nsds50ruv in the 
RUV have identical referral.
This should not occur, but replication is smart enough to just log this 
warning and continue working.

I would not recommend cleanup right now. Just clarification of the status.
Would you send all the ruv values returned by 'list-ruv' (here there is 
no duplicate).

thanks
theirry
> ________________________________
>
> Информация в этом сообщении предназначена исключительно для конкретных лиц, которым она адресована. В сообщении может содержаться конфиденциальная информация, которая не может быть раскрыта или использована кем-либо, кроме адресатов. Если вы не адресат этого сообщения, то использование, переадресация, копирование или распространение содержания сообщения или его части незаконно и запрещено. Если Вы получили это сообщение ошибочно, пожалуйста, незамедлительно сообщите отправителю об этом и удалите со всем содержимым само сообщение и любые возможные его копии и приложения.
>
> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof.
>
> (c)20mf50





More information about the Freeipa-users mailing list