[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server -> ipa-server?
Christopher Lamb
christopher.lamb at ch.ibm.com
Fri Jul 17 09:10:45 UTC 2015
Consistency sounds good.
How would the name change affect yum update?
Chris
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek at redhat.com>
To: freeipa-users at redhat.com
Date: 17.07.2015 10:49
Subject: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)?
freeipa-server -> ipa-server?
Sent by: freeipa-users-bounces at redhat.com
Hello users and developers,
I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages.
Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and
derivatives)
the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in
all
cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsistency.
Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*?
Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-)
This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I
need
to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora.
Have a nice day!
--
Petr^2 Spacek
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
More information about the Freeipa-users
mailing list