[Freeipa-users] External DNS and replication
Wimmer Ronald (BCC.B.SO)
Ronald.Wimmer at oebb.at
Thu Mar 9 08:04:24 UTC 2017
From: Martin Basti [mailto:mbasti at redhat.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 08. März 2017 14:54
To: Wimmer Ronald (BCC.B.SO) <Ronald.Wimmer at oebb.at>; freeipa-users at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] External DNS and replication
On 08.03.2017 14:05, Wimmer Ronald (BCC.B.SO) wrote:
Hi,
I am using FreeIPA with external DNS. Is it ok to balance the requests between master and replica with DNS SRV records like this:
_kerberos-master._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa1.example.net.
_kerberos-master._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa1.example.net.
_kerberos._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa1.example.net.
_kerberos._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa1.example.net.
_kpasswd._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 464 ipa1.example.net.
_kpasswd._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 464 ipa1.example.net.
_ldap._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 389 ipa1.example.net.
_ntp._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 123 ipa1.example.net.
_kerberos-master._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa2.example.net.
_kerberos-master._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa2.example.net.
_kerberos._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa2.example.net.
_kerberos._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 88 ipa2.example.net.
_kpasswd._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 464 ipa2.example.net.
_kpasswd._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 464 ipa2.example.net.
_ldap._tcp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 389 ipa2.example.net.
_ntp._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 123 ipa2.example.net.
_kerberos.example.net. 86400 IN TXT "example.net"
Looks good to me
ipa-ca.example.net. 86400 IN A 10.66.39.130
What about the "ipa-ca" entry?
ipa-ca should contain all A/AAAA records of CA replicas
IPA4.4+ support command `ipa dns-update-system-records --dry-run` to get all required records
Regards,
Ronald
Martin
Thank's a lot. In https://access.redhat.com/solutions/98043 RedHat suggest to use same weight and same priority for the SRV records. Does that make sense?
I also noticed that I have no ndp record. Are IPA clients relying on that entry? Do I have to create these manually?
_ntp._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 123 ipaserver1.example.net.
_ntp._udp.example.net. 86400 IN SRV 10 50 123 ipaserver2.example.net.
Ronald
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/attachments/20170309/685a56bc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Freeipa-users
mailing list