<div>On 09/14/2015 03:08 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:55F6C6BB.1040902@redhat.com" type="cite">On 09/11/2015 02:40 PM, Molnár Domokos wrote: <blockquote type="cite">Full log attached. "Molnár Domokos" <kretebe@freemail.hu> írta: "Pavel Březina" <pbrezina@redhat.com> írta: On 09/09/2015 09:31 PM, Molnár Domokos wrote: > I have a working IPA server and a working client config on an OpenSuse > 13.2 with the following versions: > nappali:~ # rpm -qa |grep sssd > sssd-tools-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-krb5-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > python-sssd-config-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-ipa-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-dbus-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-krb5-common-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd-ldap-1.12.2-3.4.1.i586 > sssd is confihured for nss, pam, sudo > There is a test sudo rule defined in the ipa server, which applies to > user "doma". However when the user tries to use sudo the rule does not > work. > doma@nappali:/home/doma> sudo ls > doma's password: > doma is not allowed to run sudo on nappali. This incident will be reported. > The corresponding log in the sssd_sudo.log is this: > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (0x0200): > Received client version [1]. > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_cmd_get_version] (0x0200): > Offered version [1]. > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_parse_name_for_domains] > (0x0200): name 'doma' matched without domain, user is doma > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_parse_name_for_domains] > (0x0200): name 'doma' matched without domain, user is doma > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sudosrv_cmd_parse_query_done] > (0x0200): Requesting default options for [doma] from [<ALL>] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sudosrv_get_user] (0x0200): > Requesting info about [doma@szilva] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] > [sudosrv_get_sudorules_query_cache] (0x0200): Searching sysdb with > [(&(objectClass=sudoRule)(|(sudoUser=ALL)(name=defaults)(sudoUser=doma)(sudoUser=#1816400003)(sudoUser=%ipausers)(sudoUser=%picture_access)(sudoUser=%doma)(sudoUser=+*))(&(dataExpireTimestamp<=1441826725)))] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] > [sudosrv_get_sudorules_query_cache] (0x0200): Searching sysdb with > [(&(objectClass=sudoRule)(|(name=defaults)))] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_parse_name_for_domains] > (0x0200): name 'doma' matched without domain, user is doma > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sss_parse_name_for_domains] > (0x0200): name 'doma' matched without domain, user is doma > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sudosrv_cmd_parse_query_done] > (0x0200): Requesting rules for [doma] from [<ALL>] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [sudosrv_get_user] (0x0200): > Requesting info about [doma@szilva] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] > [sudosrv_get_sudorules_query_cache] (0x0200): Searching sysdb with > [(&(objectClass=sudoRule)(|(sudoUser=ALL)(name=defaults)(sudoUser=doma)(sudoUser=#1816400003)(sudoUser=%ipausers)(sudoUser=%picture_access)(sudoUser=%doma)(sudoUser=+*))(&(dataExpireTimestamp<=1441826725)))] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:25 2015) [sssd[sudo]] > [sudosrv_get_sudorules_query_cache] (0x0200): Searching sysdb with > [(&(objectClass=sudoRule)(|(sudoUser=ALL)(sudoUser=doma)(sudoUser=#1816400003)(sudoUser=%ipausers)(sudoUser=%picture_access)(sudoUser=%doma)(sudoUser=+*)))] > (Wed Sep 9 21:25:30 2015) [sssd[sudo]] [client_recv] (0x0200): Client > disconnected! > This seems perfectly OK with one exception. The query against the sysdb > does not find the entry. This is strange because the entry is there. > Log in sssd.log: > (Wed Sep 2 08:52:13 2015) [sssd] [sysdb_domain_init_internal] (0x0200): > DB File for szilva: /var/lib/sss/db/cache_szilva.ldb > So we know that the sysdb is /var/lib/sss/db/cache_szilva.ldb > Running the exact same query seen above in the sssd_sudo.log against the > db returns: > ldbsearch -H /var/lib/sss/db/cache_szilva.ldb > "(&(objectClass=sudoRule)(|(sudoUser=ALL)(sudoUser=doma)(sudoUser=#1816400003)(sudoUser=%ipausers)(sudoUser=%picture_access)(sudoUser=%doma)(sudoUser=+*)))" > asq: Unable to register control with rootdse! > # record 1 > dn: name=Doma_ls,cn=sudorules,cn=custom,cn=szilva,cn=sysdb > cn: Doma_ls > dataExpireTimestamp: 1441830262 > entryUSN: 20521 > name: Doma_ls > objectClass: sudoRule > originalDN: cn=Doma_ls,ou=sudoers,dc=szilva > sudoCommand: ls > sudoHost: nappali.szilva > sudoRunAsGroup: ALL > sudoRunAsUser: ALL > sudoUser: doma > distinguishedName: name=Doma_ls,cn=sudorules,cn=custom,cn=szilva,cn=sysdb > # returned 1 records > # 1 entries > # 0 referrals > This confirms that the entry is indeed there in the db. Why is it found > with ldbsearch and why does sssd_sudo not find it? > I am pretty much stuck with this one. Anyone has an idea? > > Hi, this is strange. Can you provide the logs with debug level set to 0x3ff0 please? Can you also send it as an attachment? Thanks! Sure. Here it is. Now I can see that the rule is returned. The question is why the rule does not match. Anyway much better :)</blockquote> Hi, thanks for the logs. Since the rule is returned, we will get more information from sudo logs. Can you please enable sudo logging by putting the following line into /etc/sudo.conf? Debug sudo /var/log/sudo_debug all@trace Run sudo and send us /var/log/sudo_debug? Thanks</blockquote> Thanks for the tip with the proper debug syntax - I was unable to get a single log item out of sudo before. I think I have found something. This is the relevant part of the output of all@debug (you need this not trace I think): Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] username=doma Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] domainname=NULL Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] state |= USERMATCH Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] Received 1 rule(s) Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> sudo_sss_filter_result @ ./sssd.c:175 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] in_res=0xb7c9c1b8, count=1, act=INCLUDE Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] emalloc: cnt=1 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> sudo_sss_result_filterp @ ./sssd.c:648 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> sudo_sss_check_host @ ./sssd.c:556 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] val[0]=nappali.szilva Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> addr_matches @ ./match_addr.c:206 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> addr_matches_if @ ./match_addr.c:61 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- addr_matches_if @ ./match_addr.c:71 := false Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] IP address nappali.szilva matches local host: false @ addr_matches() ./match_addr.c:217 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- addr_matches @ ./match_addr.c:218 := false Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> netgr_matches @ ./match.c:941 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] netgroup appali.szilva has no leading '+' Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- netgr_matches @ ./match.c:953 := false Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] -> hostname_matches @ ./match.c:776 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] host nappali matches sudoers pattern nappali.szilva: false @ hostname_matches() ./match.c:788 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- hostname_matches @ ./match.c:789 := false Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] sssd/ldap sudoHost 'nappali.szilva' ... not Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- sudo_sss_check_host @ ./sssd.c:591 := false Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- sudo_sss_result_filterp @ ./sssd.c:654 := 0 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] reallocating result: 0xb7cb1900 (count: 1 -> 0) Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- sudo_sss_filter_result @ ./sssd.c:221 := 0xb7c9e410 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] u_sss_result=(0xb7c9c1b8, 1) => f_sss_result=(0xb7c9e410, 0) Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] <- sudo_sss_result_get @ ./sssd.c:728 := 0xb7c9e410 Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] searching SSSD/LDAP for sudoers entries Sep 14 22:13:39 sudo[2314] Done with LDAP searches And here is the code from match.c. bool hostname_matches(const char *shost, const char *lhost, const char *pattern) { debug_decl(hostname_matches, SUDO_DEBUG_MATCH) const char *host; bool rc; host = strchr(pattern, '.') != NULL ? lhost : shost; if (has_meta(pattern)) { rc = !fnmatch(pattern, host, FNM_CASEFOLD); } else { rc = !strcasecmp(host, pattern); } sudo_debug_printf(SUDO_DEBUG_DEBUG|SUDO_DEBUG_LINENO, "host %s matches sudoers pattern %s: %s", host, pattern, rc ? "true" : "false"); debug_return_bool(rc); } By the look of it it should match. I tried to find out how shost and lhost get their values - these are macros to a member of the sudo_user struct but that part is not debugged. Only thing I can confirm is that I do not get the log_warning(MSG_ONLY, N_("unable to resolve host %s"), user_host); from line 816 of sudoers.c. I also checked the hosts file and there I do have the 192.168.110.3 nappali nappali.szilva entry. Still stuck whit this. </div>