<html><body><p>Thanks Rob... appreciate the help.. can you send me what you have in nss.conf, server.xml as well? If I start off playing with something you see working without issue then maybe I can come up with something or am I wrong thinking those might affect anything? <br><br>IE .. can you send me the entire cn=encryption, cn=config section like this<br>dn: cn=encryption,cn=config<br>objectClass: top<br>objectClass: nsEncryptionConfig<br>cn: encryption<br>nsSSLSessionTimeout: 0<br>nsSSLClientAuth: allowed<br>nsSSL2: off<br>nsSSL3: off<br>creatorsName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config<br>modifiersName: cn=directory manager<br>createTimestamp: 20150420131850Z<br>modifyTimestamp: 20150420131906Z<br>nsSSL3Ciphers: -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_rc4_128_sha,-rsa_rc4_128_md5,-rsa_rc4_40_md5<br> ,-rsa_rc2_40_md5,-rsa_des_sha,-rsa_fips_des_sha,+rsa_3des_sha,+rsa_fips_3des_<br> sha,-fortezza,-fortezza_rc4_128_sha,-fortezza_null,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_r<br> c4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_des_cbc_sha<br>numSubordinates: 1<br><br><br>Sean Hogan<br><br><br><br><br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=88BBF537DFE23E918f9e8a93df938690918c88B@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Rob Crittenden ---04/29/2016 01:36:02 PM---Sean Hogan wrote: > Apparently making it the master ca wil"><font color="#424282">Rob Crittenden ---04/29/2016 01:36:02 PM---Sean Hogan wrote: > Apparently making it the master ca will not work at this point since the</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Rob Crittenden <rcritten@redhat.com></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">Sean Hogan/Durham/IBM@IBMUS</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Cc: </font><font size="2">freeipa-users@redhat.com, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@redhat.com></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">04/29/2016 01:36 PM</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">Re: [Freeipa-users] IPA vulnerability management SSL</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt>Sean Hogan wrote:<br>> Apparently making it the master ca will not work at this point since the<br>> replica is removed. So still stuck with non-changing ciphers.<br><br>Other services running on the box have zero impact on the ciphers available.<br><br>I'm not sure what is wrong because it took me just a minute to stop <br>dirsrv, modify dse.ldif with the list I provided, restart it and confirm <br>that the cipher list was better.<br><br>Entries in cn=config are not replicated.<br><br>rob<br><br>><br>><br>> Sean Hogan<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Inactive hide details for Sean Hogan---04/29/2016 08:56:57 AM---Hi Rob,<br>> I stopped IPA, modified dse.ldif, restarted with the Sean<br>> Hogan---04/29/2016 08:56:57 AM---Hi Rob, I stopped IPA, modified<br>> dse.ldif, restarted with the cipher list and it started without is<br>><br>> From: Sean Hogan/Durham/IBM<br>> To: Rob Crittenden <rcritten@redhat.com><br>> Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@redhat.com><br>> Date: 04/29/2016 08:56 AM<br>> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] IPA vulnerability management SSL<br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>><br>> Hi Rob,<br>><br>> I stopped IPA, modified dse.ldif, restarted with the cipher list and it<br>> started without issue however Same 13 ciphers. You know.. thinking about<br>> this now.. I going to try something. The box I am testing on it a<br>> replica master and not the first replica. I did not think this would<br>> make a difference since I removed the replica from the realm before<br>> testing but maybe it will not change anything thinking its stuck in the<br>> old realm?<br>><br>> Starting Nmap 5.51 ( </tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org">http://nmap.org</a></tt><tt> <</tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org/">http://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>> ) at 2016-04-29<br>> 11:51 EDT<br>> Nmap scan report for<br>> Host is up (0.000082s latency).<br>> PORT STATE SERVICE<br>> 636/tcp open ldapssl<br>> | ssl-enum-ciphers:<br>> | TLSv1.2<br>> | Ciphers (13)<br>> | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA<br>> | Compressors (1)<br>><br>> dn: cn=encryption,cn=config<br>> objectClass: top<br>> objectClass: nsEncryptionConfig<br>> cn: encryption<br>> nsSSLSessionTimeout: 0<br>> nsSSLClientAuth: allowed<br>> nsSSL2: off<br>> nsSSL3: off<br>> creatorsName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config<br>> modifiersName: cn=directory manager<br>> createTimestamp: 20150420131850Z<br>> modifyTimestamp: 20150420131906Z<br>> nsSSL3Ciphers:<br>> -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_rc4_128_sha,-rsa_rc4_128_md5,-rsa_rc4_40_md5<br>> ,-rsa_rc2_40_md5,-rsa_des_sha,-rsa_fips_des_sha,+rsa_3des_sha,+rsa_fips_3des_<br>> sha,-fortezza,-fortezza_rc4_128_sha,-fortezza_null,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_r<br>> c4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_des_cbc_sha<br>> numSubordinates: 1<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Sean Hogan<br>> Security Engineer<br>> Watson Security & Risk Assurance<br>> Watson Cloud Technology and Support<br>> email: schogan@us.ibm.com | Tel 919 486 1397<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Inactive hide details for Rob Crittenden ---04/29/2016 08:30:29<br>> AM---Sean Hogan wrote: > Hi Noriko,Rob Crittenden ---04/29/2016 08:30:29<br>> AM---Sean Hogan wrote: > Hi Noriko,<br>><br>> From: Rob Crittenden <rcritten@redhat.com><br>> To: Sean Hogan/Durham/IBM@IBMUS, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@redhat.com><br>> Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com<br>> Date: 04/29/2016 08:30 AM<br>> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] IPA vulnerability management SSL<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>><br>><br>> Sean Hogan wrote:<br>> > Hi Noriko,<br>> ><br>> > Thanks for the suggestions,<br>> ><br>> > I had to trim out the GCM ciphers in order to get IPA to start back up<br>> > or I would get the unknown cipher message<br>><br>> The trick is getting the cipher name right (it doesn't always follow a<br>> pattern) and explicitly disabling some ciphers as they are enabled by<br>> default.<br>><br>> Try this string:<br>><br>> -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_rc4_128_sha,-rsa_rc4_128_md5,-rsa_rc4_40_md5,-rsa_rc2_40_md5,-rsa_des_sha,-rsa_fips_des_sha,+rsa_3des_sha,+rsa_fips_3des_sha,-fortezza,-fortezza_rc4_128_sha,-fortezza_null,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_des_cbc_sha<br>><br>> I have an oldish install but I think it will still do what you need:<br>> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-68.el6_7.x86_64<br>><br>> Starting Nmap 7.12 ( </tt><tt><a href="https://nmap.org">https://nmap.org</a></tt><tt> ) at 2016-04-29 11:24 EDT<br>> Nmap scan report for pacer.example.com (192.168.126.2)<br>> Host is up (0.00053s latency).<br>> PORT STATE SERVICE<br>> 636/tcp open ldapssl<br>> | ssl-enum-ciphers:<br>> | TLSv1.2:<br>> | ciphers:<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A<br>> | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C<br>> | TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C<br>> | compressors:<br>> | NULL<br>> | cipher preference: server<br>> |_ least strength: C<br>><br>> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.19 seconds<br>><br>> $ sslscan pacer.example.com:636 |grep Accept<br>> Accepted TLSv1 256 bits AES256-SHA<br>> Accepted TLSv1 128 bits AES128-SHA<br>> Accepted TLSv1 112 bits DES-CBC3-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS11 256 bits AES256-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS11 128 bits AES128-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS11 112 bits DES-CBC3-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS12 256 bits AES256-SHA256<br>> Accepted TLS12 256 bits AES256-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS12 128 bits AES128-GCM-SHA256<br>> Accepted TLS12 128 bits AES128-SHA256<br>> Accepted TLS12 128 bits AES128-SHA<br>> Accepted TLS12 112 bits DES-CBC3-SHA<br>><br>> rob<br>><br>> ><br>> > Nmap is still showing the same 13 ciphers as before though like nothing<br>> > had changed and I did ipactl stop, made modification, ipactl start<br>> ><br>> > tarting Nmap 5.51 ( </tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org">http://nmap.org</a></tt><tt> <</tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org/">http://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>> ) at 2016-04-28<br>> > 18:44 EDT<br>> > Nmap scan report for<br>> > Host is up (0.000053s latency).<br>> > PORT STATE SERVICE<br>> > 636/tcp open ldapssl<br>> > | ssl-enum-ciphers:<br>> > | TLSv1.2<br>> > | Ciphers (13)<br>> > | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> > | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA<br>> > | Compressors (1)<br>> > |_ uncompressed<br>> ><br>> > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.21 seconds<br>> ><br>> > Current Config:<br>> ><br>> > dse.ldif<br>> > dn: cn=encryption,cn=config<br>> > objectClass: top<br>> > objectClass: nsEncryptionConfig<br>> > cn: encryption<br>> > nsSSLSessionTimeout: 0<br>> > nsSSLClientAuth: allowed<br>> > nsSSL2: off<br>> > nsSSL3: off<br>> > creatorsName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config<br>> > modifiersName: cn=directory manager<br>> > createTimestamp: 20150420131850Z<br>> > modifyTimestamp: 20150420131906Z<br>> > nsSSL3Ciphers:<br>> > -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_rc4_56_sha,-tls_<br>> ><br>> rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha,-tls_dhe_dss_1024_rc4_sha,+tls_rsa_aes_128_sha<br>> ><br>> ,+rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_dss_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_rsa_<br>> > aes_256_sha,+rsa_aes_256_sha<br>> > numSubordinates: 1<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > nss.conf<br>> > # SSL 3 ciphers. SSL 2 is disabled by default.<br>> > NSSCipherSuite<br>> ><br>> -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_rc4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha,-tls_dhe_dss_1024_rc4_sha,+tls_rsa_aes_128_sha,+rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_dss_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_rsa_aes_256_sha,+rsa_aes_256_sha,+tls_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+tls_dhe_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+tls_dhe_dss_aes_128_gcm_sha<br>> ><br>> > NSSProtocol TLSv1.0,TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Does nss.conf have anything to do with the dir srv ciphers? I know the<br>> > 389 docs says they are tied together so the way I have been looking at<br>> > it is nss.conf lists the allowed ciphers where dse.ldif lists which ones<br>> > to use for 389 from nss.conf. Is that correct? Is there any other place<br>> > where ciphers would be ignored?<br>> ><br>> > nss-3.19.1-8.el6_7.x86_64<br>> > sssd-ipa-1.12.4-47.el6_7.4.x86_64<br>> > ipa-client-3.0.0-47.el6_7.1.x86_64<br>> > ipa-server-selinux-3.0.0-47.el6_7.1.x86_64<br>> > ipa-pki-common-theme-9.0.3-7.el6.noarch<br>> > ipa-python-3.0.0-47.el6_7.1.x86_64<br>> > ipa-server-3.0.0-47.el6_7.1.x86_64<br>> > libipa_hbac-python-1.12.4-47.el6_7.4.x86_64<br>> > ipa-admintools-3.0.0-47.el6_7.1.x86_64<br>> > ipa-pki-ca-theme-9.0.3-7.el6.noarch<br>> > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-68.el6_7.x86_64<br>> > 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-68.el6_7.x86_64<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I need to get rid of any rc4s<br>> ><br>> > Sean Hogan<br>> > Security Engineer<br>> > Watson Security & Risk Assurance<br>> > Watson Cloud Technology and Support<br>> > email: schogan@us.ibm.com | Tel 919 486 1397<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Inactive hide details for Noriko Hosoi ---04/28/2016 12:08:59 PM---Thank<br>> > you for including me in the loop, Ludwig. On 04/28/201Noriko Hosoi<br>> > ---04/28/2016 12:08:59 PM---Thank you for including me in the loop,<br>> > Ludwig. On 04/28/2016 04:34 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>> ><br>> > From: Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@redhat.com><br>> > To: Ludwig Krispenz <lkrispen@redhat.com>, freeipa-users@redhat.com<br>> > Date: 04/28/2016 12:08 PM<br>> > Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] IPA vulnerability management SSL<br>> > Sent by: freeipa-users-bounces@redhat.com<br>> ><br>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Thank you for including me in the loop, Ludwig.<br>> ><br>> > On 04/28/2016 04:34 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>> > > If I remember correctly we did the change in default ciphers and the<br>> > option for handling in 389-ds > 1.3.3, so it would not be in RHEL6,<br>> > adding Noriko to get confirmation.<br>> ><br>> > Ludwig is right. The way how to set nsSSL3Ciphers has been changed<br>> > since 1.3.3 which is available on RHEL-7.<br>> ><br>> > This is one of the newly supported values of nsSSL3Ciphers:<br>> ><br>> > Notes: if the value contains +all, then *-<cipher>*is removed<br>> > from the list._<br>> ><br>> __http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/nss-cipher-design.html#available-by-setting-all----nss-3162-1_<br>> ><br>> > On the older 389-ds-base including 389-ds-base-1.2.11.X on RHEL-6.X, if<br>> > "+all" is found in the value, all the available ciphers are enabled.<br>> ><br>> > To workaround it, could you try explicitely setting ciphers as follows?<br>> > nsSSL3Ciphers:<br>> ><br>> -rsa_null_md5,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_rc4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha,-tls_dhe_dss_1024_rc4_sha,<br>> ><br>> +tls_rsa_aes_128_sha,+rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_dss_aes_128_sha,+tls_dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha,+tls_rsa_aes_256_sha,+rsa_aes_256_sha,<br>> ><br>> +tls_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+tls_dhe_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+tls_dhe_dss_aes_128_gcm_sha<br>> ><br>> > Thanks,<br>> > --noriko<br>> ><br>> > On 04/28/2016 04:34 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>> ><br>> > wanted to add Noriko, but hit send to quickly<br>> ><br>> > On 04/28/2016 01:26 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>> ><br>> > On 04/28/2016 12:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:<br>> > On 04/28/2016 01:23 AM, Sean Hogan wrote:<br>> > Hi Martin,<br>> ><br>> > No joy on placing - in front of the RC4s<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I modified my nss.conf to now read<br>> > # SSL 3 ciphers. SSL 2 is disabled by<br>> > default.<br>> > NSSCipherSuite<br>> ><br>> +aes_128_sha_256,+aes_256_sha_256,+ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_128_gcm_sha_256,+ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_128_sha,+ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_256_sha,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha_256,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_128_sha,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_256_sha,+rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha_256,+rsa_aes_128_sha,+rsa_aes_256_sha<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > # SSL Protocol:<br>> > # Cryptographic protocols that provide<br>> > communication security.<br>> > # NSS handles the specified protocols as<br>> > "ranges", and automatically<br>> > # negotiates the use of the strongest<br>> > protocol for a connection starting<br>> > # with the maximum specified protocol<br>> > and downgrading as necessary to the<br>> > # minimum specified protocol that can be<br>> > used between two processes.<br>> > # Since all protocol ranges are<br>> > completely inclusive, and no protocol in<br>> > the<br>> > NSSProtocol TLSv1.0,TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2<br>> ><br>> > dse.ldif<br>> ><br>> > dn: cn=encryption,cn=config<br>> > objectClass: top<br>> > objectClass: nsEncryptionConfig<br>> > cn: encryption<br>> > nsSSLSessionTimeout: 0<br>> > nsSSLClientAuth: allowed<br>> > nsSSL2: off<br>> > nsSSL3: off<br>> > creatorsName:<br>> > cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config<br>> > modifiersName: cn=directory manager<br>> > createTimestamp: 20150420131850Z<br>> > modifyTimestamp: 20150420131906Z<br>> > nsSSL3Ciphers:<br>> ><br>> +all,-rsa_null_sha,-rsa_rc4_56_sha,-tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4<br>> ><br>> > _56_sha,-tls_dhe_dss_1024_rc4_sha<br>> > numSubordinates: 1<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > But I still get this with nmap.. I<br>> > thought the above would remove<br>> > -tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha but<br>> > still showing. Is it the fact that I<br>> am not<br>> > offering<br>> > -tls_rsa_export1024_with_rc4_56_sha? If<br>> > so.. not really understanding<br>> > where it is coming from cept the +all<br>> > from DS but the - should be negating<br>> that?<br>> ><br>> > Starting Nmap 5.51 ( _http://nmap.org_<br>> > <</tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org/">http://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>>_<</tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org/">http://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>>_<br>> > <</tt><tt><a href="http://nmap.org/">http://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>>) at 2016-04-27<br>> 17:37 EDT<br>> > Nmap scan report for<br>> > Host is up (0.000086s latency).<br>> > PORT STATE SERVICE<br>> > 636/tcp open ldapssl<br>> > | ssl-enum-ciphers:<br>> > | TLSv1.2<br>> > | Ciphers (13)<br>> > | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> > | SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA<br>> > | Compressors (1)<br>> > |_ uncompressed<br>> ><br>> > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up)<br>> > scanned in 0.32 seconds<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > It seems no matter what config I put<br>> > into nss.conf or dse.ldif nothing changes<br>> > with my nmap results. Is there supposed<br>> > to be a be a section to add TLS ciphers<br>> > instead of SSL Not sure now, CCing<br>> Ludwig who was involved in<br>> > the original RHEL-6<br>> > implementation. If I remember correctly we<br>> did the change in default<br>> > ciphers and the option for handling in 389-ds > 1.3.3,<br>> > so it would not be in RHEL6, adding Noriko to get<br>> > confirmation.<br>> ><br>> > but the below comments about changing ciphers in<br>> > dse.ldif could help in using the "old" way to set ciphers<br>> > Just to be sure, when you are modifying<br>> > dse.ldif, the procedure<br>> > should be always following:<br>> ><br>> > 1) Stop Directory Server service<br>> > 2) Modify dse.ldif<br>> > 3) Start Directory Server service<br>> ><br>> > Otherwise it won't get applied and will get<br>> > overwritten later.<br>> ><br>> > In any case, the ciphers with RHEL-6 should be<br>> > secure enough, the ones in<br>> > FreeIPA 4.3.1 should be even better. This is for<br>> > example an nmap taken on<br>> > FreeIPA Demo instance that runs on FreeIPA 4.3.1:<br>> ><br>> > $ nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 636<br>> > ipa.demo1.freeipa.org<br>> ><br>> > Starting Nmap 7.12 ( _https://nmap.org_<br>> > <</tt><tt><a href="https://nmap.org/">https://nmap.org/</a></tt><tt>>) at 2016-04-28 12:02 CEST<br>> > Nmap scan report for ipa.demo1.freeipa.org<br>> > (209.132.178.99)<br>> > Host is up (0.18s latency).<br>> > PORT STATE SERVICE<br>> > 636/tcp open ldapssl<br>> > | ssl-enum-ciphers:<br>> > | TLSv1.2:<br>> > | ciphers:<br>> > | TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256<br>> > (secp256r1) - A<br>> > | TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA<br>> > (secp256r1) - A<br>> > | TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256<br>> > (secp256r1) - A<br>> > | TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA<br>> > (secp256r1) - A<br>> > | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (dh<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (dh<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (dh<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (dh<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (dh<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (rsa<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa<br>> 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (rsa<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa<br>> 2048) - A<br>> > | TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (rsa<br>> > 2048) - A<br>> > | compressors:<br>> > | NULL<br>> > | cipher preference: server<br>> > |_ least strength: A<br>> ><br>> > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in<br>> > 21.12 seconds<br>> ><br>> > Martin<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:<br>> > </tt><tt><a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users</a></tt><tt><br>> > Go to </tt><tt><a href="http://freeipa.org">http://freeipa.org</a></tt><tt> for more info on the project<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br><br></tt><br><br><BR>
</body></html>