[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] K12Linux listserv changes...

At 05:08 PM 02/17/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Tom Brown wrote:
>>I assume the primary goal (aside from fun) of k12ltsp is to make GNU/Linux
>>available and useful to schools everywhere.
>The primary goal of K12LTSP was to solve a need for one of my customers
>(Paul @ Riverdale). 
>Making it available & useful to others is a secondary goal, we consider
>it part of our obligation to give back to the community who suppilied us
>with the foundation to achieve our primary goal.
>>So, ideally, the project will work toward distro-neutrality. 
>Well fortunately K12LTSP is based on LTSP and Red Hat, both of which are
>dedicated to releasing their work under the GPL. Almost all of the work
>that Paul and I have done on K12LTSP is derived from either Red Hat or
>LTSP code.
>All of the source code is available if you, or anyone else, would like
>to port it to another distro (or OS for that matter). The basics should be
>pretty trivial to move, since LTSP supports Red Hat 6.0-7.2, Mandrake 7.2-
>8.1, SuSE 6.2-7.2, Debian 2.0-3.0, Caldera 2.3-2.4, and Conectiva 7.0.
>There is a similar project based in Germany (http://termserv.berlios.de),
>which aims to be distro-neutral but is currently only available for
>Debian. Another based in France is built on Mandrake

I was ignorant of your relationship with RH and your project goals. Since
my speculations are based on faulty assumptions, they are not useful. 

I've been a member of the k12ltsp list since last October and ltsp-discuss
since last July and don't recall attributions to RH techs and engineers or
mention of RH participation. Perhaps I missed the references. Ditto for the
k12lstp web site. I thought all the work was done by the principals (you,
Paul, Jim)  and contributors to ltsp/k12ltsp lists and that k12ltsp was
independent of distros. The fact the k12ltsp distro is based on RH should
have been a major clue -- it just seemed incidental to me.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]