[K12OSN] why RAID?
Jack
jackpal at cfl.rr.com
Fri Dec 3 16:18:55 UTC 2004
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 09:36 -0600, Jim Kronebusch wrote:
> > I see a lot of posts here asking about setting up a RAID
> > system. My ignorance and inexperience will no doubt show
> > through here, but why is it so important to get RAID set up?
> > Why not just have a cron job that makes a copy of /home or
> > any other important directories? It could be set to run
> > every night, or even after every class period. It could be
> > set with a low priority via the "nice" command so that it
> > doesn't interfere much with the read/write operations of
> > users who are currently logged in.
>
> In addition to Jim McQuillan's point you also get the performance
> benefits with RAID0 or RAID5 via striping. Say with a single drive your
> platters need to make a full revolution to write every bit of data. If
> you stripe with 2 drives you cut the time in half (theoretically), 3
> drives into a third and so on. Because while the first drive is making
> is revolution after writing the bit the next drive has the ability to
> write a bit etc.
>
> So bottom line is RAID1 and RAID5 get you redundancy with immediate
> failover, no downtime. And RAID0 and RAID5 gain performance with write
> speeds. My preference is RAID5 when possible because it gains the best
> of both worlds, but unfortunately you pay more for the controllers that
> handle it. If you are on a budget crunch RAID0+1 in my opinion is the
> next best option.
>
> And I personally never trust backups, they are my insurance. But when
> there is a server down and users on my back I want immediate results
> that allow me to do repairs in the off hours, and leave the backups on
> the shelf.
>
> Another note is that with RAID0 you get the full total of all of the
> drive amounts added together (80GB+80GB+80GB=240GB). With RAID1 you
> only get the total of the one drive (80GB+80GB=80GB). And with RAID5
> you loose the size of at least one of the drives in the raid (RAID5 uses
> 3 drives minimum)(80GB+80GB+80GB=160GB). So RAID5 also makes the most
> efficient use of your storage capacities while maintaining redundancy
> and failover.
>
> Also with RAID you can buy "Hot Swap" controllers and drive trays (at an
> extra cost of course). This allows you to remove the bad drive while
> the machine is running and the RAID rebuilds itself on the fly. Your
> users never see a difference and your not in after hours.
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
>
>
>
RAID5 is a very good way to protect your data due to the parity but when
using RAID5 you take pretty bit (up to 75%) WRITE performance hit.
Only READ performace is gained when using RAID5. Also depending on how
many drives you use with RAID5 you loose storage. You need a minumum of
3 drives to do RAID5
RAID0 gives the best performance by far but it is not fault tolerant at
all.
Here is a good site for some information on RAID.
http://www.acnc.com/04_00.html
Jack
More information about the K12OSN
mailing list