[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] 4.2 beta



I wasn't having any boot problems ever with 4.2, but.beta9 for me was
acting REALLY weird.  I let the first disk go all night.  It seemed to
be installing packages but very
 slowly and the "Remaining Time:" jumped way up.  I tried beta7 and it
got stuck just as x started and before  the software agrement and
first user creation.   I ended up just going back to beta2.   I am
using a pretty ancient cdrom, although I'm sure people with boot
problems have tried different cdroms.  just thought I'd mention it.

-peter


On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:19:52 -0500, Jesse McDonnell
<jessemcdonnell comcast net> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:23:29 -0500
> norbert <bear2bar netscape net> wrote:
> 
> > eharrison mail mesd k12 or us wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, norbert wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Eric,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the help with Yum, I finally removed all previous installs
> > >> related to acroread and proceeded with the update/upgrade & it now
> > >> works.
> > >> Just a quick question, why do the 4.2 beta CDs come up on screen as
> > >> K12ltsp4.1.191 ? Is there an error ?
> [snip]
> > BTW There seems to be a difference in the behaviour of CD1 when it is
> > rsync versus when it is downloaded completely. The beta9 rsync still has
> > boot problems but the complete download of beta9 does not, in other
> > words it seems to work. But I've only tested it on a couple of units.
> 
> fwiw, the beta9 disc 1 that worked for me was rsynced (4.0.1-1 > 4.2.0-beta2 > beta4 > beta8 > beta9).
> 
> Jesse McDonnell
> 
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]