[K12OSN] Bottom post

[Henry Hartley]

Ken Meyer wrote:
> It appears that it's time for the annual rehash of this issue, which
> is apparently a "sine qua non" for all geek-oriented lists.  So, my
> intuition is screaming to let this lie, as it too will pass; but
> apparently, I am going to ignore that internal advice yet again.

What are you talking about?

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Roger
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 7:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [K12OSN] Bottom post
> 
> Around Mon,Sep 27 2004, at 10:45,  Jay Pfaffman, wrote:
> 
>> the conversation and don't need to see the quoted text (since they
>> just read the other message).  Then it's a drag to have to scroll
>> down through the quoted text, which likely includes lots of stuff not
> 
> Properly done, you would cut the lines of garbage that aren't
> relevant. Unlike top-posters that feel 80k of text is okay since it's
> down below. (no, yours wasn't 80k.)

Oh, I see.  Never mind. ;-)

-- 
Henry