[K12OSN] Bottom post

[Sudev Barar]

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:27, Henry Hartley wrote:
> Ken Meyer wrote:
> > It appears that it's time for the annual rehash of this issue, which
> > is apparently a "sine qua non" for all geek-oriented lists.  So, my
> > intuition is screaming to let this lie, as it too will pass; but
> > apparently, I am going to ignore that internal advice yet again.
> 
> What are you talking about?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > 
> > From: Roger
> > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 7:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [K12OSN] Bottom post
> > 
> > Around Mon,Sep 27 2004, at 10:45,  Jay Pfaffman, wrote:
> > 
> >> the conversation and don't need to see the quoted text (since they
> >> just read the other message).  Then it's a drag to have to scroll
> >> down through the quoted text, which likely includes lots of stuff not
> > 
> > Properly done, you would cut the lines of garbage that aren't
> > relevant. Unlike top-posters that feel 80k of text is okay since it's
> > down below. (no, yours wasn't 80k.)
> 
> Oh, I see.  Never mind. ;-)
Beautifully and amply clarified.
Viva le bottom(post) ;-0
-- 
Sudev Barar
Learning Linux