[K12OSN] Etherchannel link

["Terrell Prudé, Jr."]

The name of the spec for this is "IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation Control 
Protocol."  Cisco's EtherChannel is simply Cisco's implementation of 
IEEE 802.3ad.  The Linux kernel's Channel Bonding is another.

Since you're sold on a Gig-E backbone anyway (and I agree), I did some 
checking tonight, and Amer.com's SS3GR4i switch also is said to support 
IEEE 802.3ad, and it is considerably less money than a Catalyst 3750.  
They'll let you eval one free of charge for 45 days, so it's worth a look.

--TP

Ascension Tech wrote:

>So far, I have one vote for and one against using for purchasing a
>cisco 'etherchannel link' capable switch.  Does anyone else want to
>chime in?  Are there any other switch manufactures that do this kind
>of thing?  (ie. gigabit channel bonding) Personally I'm leaning toward
>purchasing the catalyst 3750 24 port because if feel we need a gigabit
>backbone one way or another.    Any input would be greatly
>appreciated.
>
>Thank you,
>Peter   
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:09:35 -0500, Shawn Austin <austinsr at uindy.edu> wrote:
>  
>
>>We have used channel bonding with our IBM servers and cisco switches for
>>about 2 years now, and it has been more trouble than its worth.
>>We occasionally have strange packet loss that no one can account for,
>>and I have never noticed any true thru put advantages.
>>
>>If you decide to use it, make sure that you stress test the server under
>>heavy load and monitor for any packet loss.
>>
>>
>>Michael C Wescott wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 15:26, Ascension Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hey All,
>>>>Were about to upgrade some network equipment and I was wondering if
>>>>anyone has experience using Cisco's "etherchannel link" between the
>>>>switch and LTSP server.  We are thinking of getting a catalyst 3750.
>>>>Can anyone share their experiences?  Server side, is it a matter of
>>>>following the instructions for channel bonding on the wiki?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>The bonding protocol is compatible with Cisco's Etherchannel. I don't
>>>know about the 3750 in particular since I played around with a Catalyst
>>>6000 when I was looking at it (preparing for a presentation to the local
>>>Linux User's Group).
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>K12OSN mailing list
>>>K12OSN at redhat.com
>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>>>For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>--
>>Shawn Austin
>>
>>University of Indianapolis
>>Client Services
>>788-3362
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>K12OSN mailing list
>>K12OSN at redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>>For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>K12OSN mailing list
>K12OSN at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>
>  
>


-- 
_____________________
Do you GNU!? <http://www.gnu.org>
Be virus- and spam-free with Free/Open Source Software (FOSS). Check it 
out! <http://www.mozilla.org/thunderbird>