[K12OSN] I need opinions....backup idea for when Terminal server down and I'm not around
Christopher K. Johnson
ckjohnson at gwi.net
Sun Jul 10 11:45:10 UTC 2005
David Trask wrote:
>I worry about what happens if the Terminal Server fails while
>I'm far away (like at Linux World). Until now they could boot into
>Windows and still have the class go on (remember I'm a computer teacher as
>well as the tech director and have a full slate of classes...grades K-8
>over the course of a week....I see about 450-600 kids) When I go to
>dedicated thin-clients...K12LTSP server goes down...they're dead in the
You have other points of failure that would be of equal impact, and
different client machines would not protect against any of them failing:
* Your ethernet switch in the closet.
* Your Internet Firewall (also a Linux box)
* Your dns server for the private network (I think that's on the
Firewall in your case)
* Your Internet service router (probably a Cisco)
If it were me - I would spend the money on redundant hardware in the
LTSP server, and make other configuration changes for higher
availability of the server:
* The most likely server failure is a disk drive - use software raid
disk and hot-plug disk drives if possible
* The next most likely server failure is a power supply - servers
with dual redundant power supplies are nice, or at least with a
hot-pluggable power supply if not redundant.
On the software/configuration side of things separate filesystems for
/var, /home, /tmp, and quotas on /home for users will protect against
space problems bringing things to a grinding halt.
Make sure you have good UPS power backup and surge suppression for all
your server/switch/router equipment, with sufficient capacity for
everything running on it.
You can make services a bit more robust by adding a caching secondary
dns server somewhere on your private network (perhaps on your LTSP server).
DHCP is another such service, slightly less critical if you set long
leases, but essential just the same. Two DHCP servers configured for
failover are now supported, although I have no personal experience yet
with how well that works.
The support for clustering and cluster based file systems continues to
improve in FC4, and I would anticipate someone perfecting a clustered
solution for LTSP in the next year. So probably a redundant failover
pair of LTSP servers with the filesystem and quota configuration
suggested above would be your ideal solution. Until then you can still
implement the other suggestions to reduce the highest failure risks.
"Spend less! Do more! Go Open Source..." -- Dirigo.net
Chris Johnson, RHCE #807000448202021
More information about the K12OSN