[K12OSN] Re: tuxpaint and others running slow
Dan Kegel
daniel.r.kegel at gmail.com
Tue Oct 25 21:08:32 UTC 2005
On 10/25/05, Justin Paulsen <paulsenj at frederic.k12.wi.us> wrote:
> top - 10:03:37 up 3 days, 21:42, 2 users, load average: 0.51, 0.41, 0.47
> Tasks: 229 total, 1 running, 228 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 11.6% us, 6.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 79.4% id, 0.0% wa, 2.7% hi, 0.0% si
> Mem: 4091532k total, 1381188k used, 2710344k free, 134052k buffers
> Swap: 2031608k total, 0k used, 2031608k free, 756124k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 6724 elem_14 11 -4 19480 5984 2336 S 1.7 0.1 0:09.72 tuxtype2
> 6688 elem_03 11 -4 19392 5908 2336 S 1.3 0.1 0:13.09 tuxtype2
> 6706 elem_09 11 -4 19428 5884 2332 S 1.3 0.1 0:12.02 tuxtype2
> 6712 elem_10 11 -4 19428 5884 2332 S 1.3 0.1 0:11.27 tuxtype2
>... [about 20 tuxtype2's running]
OK! Looks like you're not swapping, and you're not hurting
overall for CPU time.
> [root at Ayumi ~]# ping -c 100 192.168.0.254
> PING 192.168.0.254 (192.168.0.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms
> ... [No packet loss in 10 tries, very fast]
And you don't have very high packet loss (though I can't tell
for sure since you didn't include the statistics at the end)
> I heard about a ULIMIT setting that caps memory or cpu usage, could
> dissabling it help with this problem? And if so where is this setting?
That probably won't help. It just kills the app if you go too high.
(See 'man ulimit'.)
> I will try tweaking verynice and let you know what it does, but I must
> say I don't have a lot of hope for it. Still it is worth a try.
I'd say there's a very good chance that it will help!
Your apps appear to be starved for CPU for no good reason.
Let us know if shutting verynice down helps.
Last question: what kernel are you running?
- Dan
More information about the K12OSN
mailing list