jim at winonacotter.org
Wed Jul 12 04:16:22 UTC 2006
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:05:56 +1200, Krsnendu Dasa wrote
> I like the sound of a central LDAP server. That would make upgrading
> K12LTSP a lot easier. Also makes the option of parallel
> loadbalancing K12LTSP servers practical. What sort of machine would
> you recommend as SMBLDAP server with /home mounted on it. HD would
> be important of course. What about RAM and CPU?
I suppose like most things, it would depend on how many users simultaneously,
and the amount of data written to the drives. As far as LDAP goes, I can't
imagine that is very intensive at all. I would have to imagine a 500mhz box
with 512mb RAM would server a few hundred users. But since in most scenarios
for setting this up you are probably looking to manage a handful of servers,
you are probably looking at quite a few users and a lot of drive traffic. So
I would recommend a striped SCSI raid array for the /home share and at least a
I am sure someone (David) might have some good info on real life load to give
you and then you could possibly scale up or down accordingly.
Probably a good rule of thumb, don't make the drive array any less than you
would use in any single LTSP server.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Cotter Technology
Department, and is believed to be clean.
More information about the K12OSN