[K12OSN] K12LTSP-7.0.0-i386-BETA5

[Huck]

Luis has echo'd my reasoning...
I have a CentOS4.3 server that I use for staff..and I'm not overly 
impressed honestly..yes it has been rock solid...but there have been a 
number of things that I've not been able to get to compile(mostly a lack 
of time to troubleshoot, so I moved those off to my debian server that 
is my TANK ;)

--Huck

Luis Montes wrote:
> Terrell Prudé Jr. wrote:
>> Any reason you can't use the new 5.0EL version?  It's been solid as a 
>> rock for me.
>>
>> --TP
>> _______________________________
>> Do you GNU!?
>> Microsoft Free since 2003 <http://www.gnu.org/>--the ultimate 
>> antivirus protection!
>>
>>
>> Huck wrote:
>>> is this BETA5, pretty much good to go? like the final beta before 
>>> release? I've got 10 days before the server MUST be up, and I'm 
>>> squeeze'n each one hope'n 7.0 is ready for production even if it 
>>> means a plethora of "yum upgrade" in the post-install time.
>>>
>>> --Huck
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> K12OSN mailing list
>> K12OSN at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
> 
> I love centos as a server and 5 is rock solid, but I'd much rather use 
> fedora for workstations.  I'm in the same situation as some of you 
> others on this list, that is, I need to update before school starts. If 
> we don't have a choice, I may go with Centos5 or even edubuntu (MueKow 
> looks interesting).
> Centos 5  will only get maintenance updates and not the latest and 
> greatest software. For example, it uses firefox 1.5 and as far as I know 
> will never get updated to 2.0 from the standard repositories.
> 
> Luis
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
> 
>