[K12OSN] latest Flash 9,0,115,0 : slow in ltsp

[James P. Kinney III]

William,

I've been using the .115 version on desktops with some (anecdotal only)
speed up. I will be testing in a live TC environment shortly  (test
server in use at the moment).

I hope this is not a general case issue as the inclusion of multicore
and thread support should make it _more_ suitable, not less for the lTSP
configuration.

That said, the client should make no difference as all of the lifting
happens on the server (unless you have a "thick client" setup). 

On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 12:09 -0500, William Fragakis wrote:
> Ever in the desire to muck up my home sandbox, I updated to the latest
> flash plugin 9,0,115,0. Framerates slowed to a crawl on both a typical
> thin client (Ntavo 9010)and more robust one sporting a Radeon 9200 PCI
> video card. Video would slow to just several fps.
> 
> Has anyone else experienced this or, instead, better performance with
> this version? Reverting to 9.0.48.0 restored things. 
> 
> Regards,
> William Fragakis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
> 
-- 
James P. Kinney III          
CEO & Director of Engineering 
Local Net Solutions,LLC        
770-493-8244                    
http://www.localnetsolutions.com

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/k12osn/attachments/20071207/df518c2b/attachment.sig>