[K12OSN] Two subnets

[Jim McQuillan]

Michael Blinn wrote:
> David Hopkins wrote:
>> On 1/23/07, *Michael Blinn* <mblinn at peopleplaces.org 
>> <mailto:mblinn at peopleplaces.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Jan 23 15:02:09 mail dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:09 mail dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.251
>>     <http://192.168.1.251/> to 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:10 mail dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.251
>>     <http://192.168.1.251/> ( 192.168.1.254 <http://192.168.1.254/>) from
>>     00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:10 mail dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.251
>>     <http://192.168.1.251/> to 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:15 mail dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:16 mail dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.253
>>     <http://192.168.0.253/> to 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:16 mail dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.253
>>     <http://192.168.0.253/> ( 192.168.1.254 <http://192.168.1.254/>) from
>>     00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>     Jan 23 15:02:16 mail dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.253
>>     <http://192.168.0.253/> to 00:10:5a:19:b3:fa via eth1
>>      
>>
>> A quick guess:  From the above it seems you have only 1 NIC for the subnet?  
>> Why is eth1 responding on both subnets?  Terrel's setup was using 2 NICs: one 
>> for each subnet.
> 
> No, that's what is odd. There are two NICs for the two subnets. One is 
> 192.168.0.0/24 and one is 192.168.1.0/24. DHCPD appears to be handing out 
> addresses without accounting for the two nics/subnets. I can only assume it's 
> due to a problem in my dhcpd.conf but I can't find the problem.

Are both of those nics plugged into the same switch?

Jim McQuillan
jam at Ltsp.org