[K12OSN] nic bonding anyone using it in k12ltsp labs
Huck
dhuckaby at paasda.org
Thu Nov 29 03:34:35 UTC 2007
2yrs ago I tried with K12LTSP 4.0...and it was a miserable experience
for me...but I was quite new at the time...and it didn't perform as well
as expected...constant woes...
after Jim's description though it seems like I was merely "doing it
wrong"...and the school has money now so they aren't so keen on keeping
saving... the thin clients lasted for 4yrs..hoping to squeeze 2 more out
of them as well.. but *shrugs*
--Huck
Barry Cisna wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Just wondering if anyone at current is running any k12ltsp labs with nic
> bonded nics? If so what if any is the actual performance boost? There are
> a few how to's out now that makes nic bonding seem pretty reliable. It
> seems you would bound to benefit some with " more pipes":) I'm not enough
> of a numbers cruncher/ bean counter to figure were the actual bottleneck
> lies as far as bus/pci speed etc. Would there be any disadvantages of
> using a quad nic versus two or four nics for example? I thought if a
> person plopped in a quad nic into a server you could use two holes for
> eth0 and two holes for eth1. I've always wanted to toy around with this
> but it seems your better off finding what happens from actual past users
> of this kinda stuff.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Barry Cisna
> westcentral school
>
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>
>
More information about the K12OSN
mailing list