[K12OSN] LTSP5
Craig White
craig at tobyhouse.com
Fri Oct 12 16:22:34 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 21:48 -0400, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>
> Peter Scheie wrote:
> > Actually, a beta version of K12LTSP7, based on Fedora 7, is available at
> > ftp://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/pub/K12LTSP/testing/7.0.0-32bit/iso
> > and has been since July or so. The problem is that K12LTSP is largely
> > the result of one man's efforts, Eric, and the time he can devote to it
> > varies.
> >
> > While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's
> > not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2.
> > Therefore, in many (most?) cases, K12LTSP 6, based on LTSP 4.2 and
> > Fedora 6, or K12LTSP-5EL, based on LTSP 4.2 and Centos5, is just fine,
> > and can actually perform better in some areas such as client boot time.
> > Lately, I've been sticking with vesion 5EL because it's got long-term
> > support, and I don't see any compelling advantage to LTSP 5 yet. LTSP 5
> > is the future, and I watch it closely, but I don't think users will
> > notice much if any difference. Others may disagree with me, and that's
> > okay. ;-)
> >
>
>
> LTSP-5 is going to give you cool things like the latest version of Xorg.
> LTSP-4.2 is stuck back in the world of Xorg-6.9. By today's standards
> thats old stuff. If you are using older hardware, LTSP-4.2 is great.
> If you have newer thin clients, based on newer chipsets, your only hope
> might be LTSP-5.
>
> the LTSP-5 in Ubuntu Gutsy, which will be released next week is WAY
> better than any previous releases. It addresses the boot-time and
> run-time performance issues. It has awesome local device support, audio
> support, secure login and a bunch more features.
>
> While K12LTSP is an awesome distro, the LTSP that's in it is starting to
> show its age.
----
even though I've always been a Red Hat / Fedora / CentOS user, I would
have no qualms about switching over to Ubuntu for LTSP.
--
Craig White <craig at tobyhouse.com>
More information about the K12OSN
mailing list