[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] 64 bit ltsp vs. virtualization

Luis Montes wrote:

I'm placing an order today for a new server. The school I'm using it at has about 75 thin clients. Currently we're using an smbldap serer and two dual-core 4GB ram servers.

I'm gonna spend 5 or 6 K today on a 64bit 8-core 16GB ram monster. (well monster compared to what I have right now)

Now I'd like to just add this new box to the network as another ltsp server using 64 bit edubuntu or fedora+ltsp, but so far my couple of months with a 64 bit desktop have me thinking this might not be the best approach.

The main problem I have is that Adobe's has yet to get off their butts and product a 64bit flash plugin. I know I can use the nspluginwrapper but it only seems to work about half the time, and when it does work, half the time sound doesn't. I imagine that sound through the thin clients will be even more troublesome.

The other option I have is to load centos5.1 or ubuntu 8.04 on the new server and something like vmware server to slice it up with 4 or so 32bit guests.

That second option seems like a waste of resources, but it may give me less headaches.

Surely there are other ltsp users in the same boat right now?

I have a quadcore with 4 GB RAM loaded with K12LTSP 5EL 64-bit. We do run into those issues with Flash being 32-bit only (crashes with nspluginwrapper and 32-bit Flash under 64-bit Firefox, although you can install 32-bit Firefox only) and no 64-bit Java browser plugin being available. You should be able to use 16 GB RAM with the PAE kernel on 32-bit Linux (up to 64 GB according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension) .

Nils Breunese.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]