[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: [K12OSN] Preparing K12Linux F11


I think the case for LTS is as strong today as it always has been.  

I completely agree with you on including LTS 4.x in a Centros version.

Where I disagree with you is on legacy hardware being the driving factor.
Cost of operation is still the leading factor as far as I am concerned.

Steven Santos
Director, Simply Circus, Inc.
 Email: Steven SimplyCircus com
  Mail: 14 Pierrepont Road
        Newton, MA 02462
 Phone: 617-527-0667
   Web: www.SimplyCircus.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: k12osn-bounces redhat com [mailto:k12osn-bounces redhat com] On
> Behalf Of Terrell Prude' Jr.
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:52 PM
> To: Support list for open source software in schools.
> Subject: Re: [K12OSN] Preparing K12Linux F11
> Jeff Siddall wrote:
> > It seems like there are two user communities here.  One has legacy
> > hardware (like 486 machines, with no 64 bit servers) and the other,
> > which is the group I belong to, has modern hardware -- exclusively 64
> > bit servers and generally 586+ clients.
> >
> > Given that there is a decade, or perhaps more, of Moore's law
> separating
> > the two groups it's pretty tough to make both happy!
> >
> > My impression as a relatively new K12Linux user is that it is perhaps
> > the most bleeding edge of all LTSP distros, largely due to the fact
> that
> > it is based on the latest Fedora, which is one of the most bleeding
> edge
> > distros.  As such, K12Linux really does not seem like the right place
> to
> > try to support legacy hardware.
> >
> > Further, LTSP5 is perhaps the wrong version to base a legacy hardware
> > LTSP distro on, given it's significantly increased resource
> requirements
> > from LTSP4.
> >
> > Two solutions for supporting legacy hardware come to mind.  One is
> for
> > "someone" to continue to maintain a LTSP4 based distribution on an OS
> > with long term support (ie: CentOS).  The other is for "someone" to
> > create a custom K12Linux spin that takes out a lot of the weight of
> > K12Linux and optimizes it for legacy hardware.  Not sure of the
> > viability of these, or who the magical "someone" might be.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> Fortunately, we already have an excellent LTSP4-based distro today, and
> that's K12LTSP 5EL, which will be supported until the year 2014.  I'd
> suggest that any CentOS 6-based K12Linux also include LTSP 4 as an
> optional "for legacy hardware" installatation.  The Fedora releases
> should stay bleeding edge, because that's the whole point of Fedora.
> But now we're getting to a point where LTSP might no longer be a good
> business case.
> The whole point of LTSP was to be able to reuse old computers as thin
> clients to save both money and the environment.  IIRC, for a time, Jim
> McQuillan himself even resold Dell OptiPlex GX1's as a thin-client
> option not so long ago.  If we're now going toward super-powerful (and
> increasingly expensive) thin client hardware, then we have a problem.
> As a buyer, I'd be better off spending the extra $20 for a full-fledged
> PC and install my choice of distro on the hard disk (Ghost, Kickstart,
> however).  Oh, and I just saved the expense of buying an LTSP server.
> Whoops....
> Here's an example of what I mean.
> http://www.zareason.com/shop/product.php?productid=16183&cat=249&page=1
> --TP
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]