[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] perplexing issue with 64bit flash



The Adobe website states that libflashsupport is no longer needed starting
with ver 10.

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Christopher K. Johnson wrote:

> On my only 64-bit machine which is running Fedora 9 it required not only
> the flash-plugin from adobe but also:
> yum install libflashsupport.i386
>
> That could be worth a try.
> Chris
>
> David Hopkins wrote:
> > Not a solution, but have you checked to see exactly what packages are
> > different between the systems?  I've tried using rpm -q -a > rpm.out
> > on different systems and diff'ing the output to check that I have
> > servers configured identically.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dave Hopkins
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Julius Szelagiewicz <julius turtle com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Folks,
> >>        I've run into a really strange issue with 64bit flash: On three
> >> AMD based 64 bit machines (K12 Cenos 5, updated to the latest) I have
> >> installed the 64bit Flash from Adobe. On machine A (my little test server)
> >> it runs like a charm, on machine B (my home server) it runs some stuff
> >> (Youtube), but not other (NYTimes), on machine C (production server, where
> >> i really need it) it doesn't run at all. I see no error messages anywhere.
> >> The software releases are the same on all three machines. Any ideas?
> >> Thanks, julius
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]