[K12OSN] yum update vs. /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules

[Dan Young]

JFYI, fuse is now included in upstream EL 5.4

--
Dan Young <dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us>
Multnomah ESD - Technology Services
503-257-1562



On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:59 PM, "Terrell Prudé Jr."
<microman at cmosnetworks.com> wrote:
> Yes, I got that.  What's happening is that there's an update to the fuse
> package, which includes /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules, and an ltsp package
> also installs that file.  The two packages are thus fighting over who wins.
>
> What you do is rename the 99-fuse.rules file to, say, 99-fuse.rules.bak and
> then go to /var/cache/yum/k12ltsp/packages.  Do an "rpm -Uvh --force" on
> whatever package it is that wants to install a new 99-fuse.rules (it starts
> with "fuse").  Then, once you're done, you should have both 99-fuse.rules
> (from the new CentOS 5.4 fuse package) and your .bak version from the
> ltsp-something package.
>
> Give your system a test drive w/ a thin client.  If you're doing local
> floppies or something similar, be sure to try that out.  If things are
> continuing to work just fine, then leave things as they are.  If not, then
> just rename the new 99-fuse.rules file to 99-fuse.rules.rpmnew or something
> like that, and rename your "old" one from the ltsp-something package to
> 99-fuse.rules.
>
> --TP
> _______________________________
> Do you GNU?
> Microsoft Free since 2003--the ultimate antivirus protection!
>
>
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Is anyone with a Centos5 based k12ltsp system getting a conflict for
> /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules when trying to update to 5.4?  If so, what's
> the best solution?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>