[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] yum update vs. /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules



Yes, I got that.  What's happening is that there's an update to the fuse package, which includes /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules, and an ltsp package also installs that file.  The two packages are thus fighting over who wins.

What you do is rename the 99-fuse.rules file to, say, 99-fuse.rules.bak and then go to /var/cache/yum/k12ltsp/packages.  Do an "rpm -Uvh --force" on whatever package it is that wants to install a new 99-fuse.rules (it starts with "fuse").  Then, once you're done, you should have both 99-fuse.rules (from the new CentOS 5.4 fuse package) and your .bak version from the ltsp-something package.

Give your system a test drive w/ a thin client.  If you're doing local floppies or something similar, be sure to try that out.  If things are continuing to work just fine, then leave things as they are.  If not, then just rename the new 99-fuse.rules file to 99-fuse.rules.rpmnew or something like that, and rename your "old" one from the ltsp-something package to 99-fuse.rules.

--TP
_______________________________
Do you GNU?
Microsoft Free since 2003--the ultimate antivirus protection!


Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone with a Centos5 based k12ltsp system getting a conflict for /etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules when trying to update to 5.4?  If so, what's the best solution?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]