[K12OSN] CentOS or Scientific Linux?
Terrell Prude' Jr.
microman at cmosnetworks.com
Mon Jan 2 14:01:51 UTC 2012
A lot of us don't do Facebook, for a lot of reasons. But to answer your
question about K12Linux, I'd suggest CentOS 6.2. Looks like they just
needed to figure out RH's changes for v6, and that they've now done that.
Just as a test, one time I took a RHEL 5 box running NMIS and pointed it
at the CentOS repositories (the subscription had ended a year ago, the
box was non-production, so no real risk there). The OS not only updated
properly, but it looked just like CentOS 5 afterwards. Continued to run
beautifully. Just one indication of how exact CentOS is with keeping
with RHEL, and I like that.
Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> Hey folks,
> Currently K12Linux is based on SL6.1 because CentOS has been very bad
> at keeping up with updates in the past year. But then recently CentOS
> surprised everyone by releasing 6.2 very rapidly after RHEL 6.2. SL
> 6.2 is slightly behind. You folks think we should we keep K12Linux
> with SL, or move to CentOS 6.2?
> BTW, I really hope people can move discussion to the K12Linux Facebook
> group. I can more easily read and respond to stuff there than this
> mailing list.
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
More information about the K12OSN