[katello-devel] Custom type or Yum

[Brad Buckingham]

On 07/29/2011 10:22 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 10:11 AM, Todd Sanders wrote:
>> On 07/29/2011 09:54 AM, Jason Rist wrote:
>>> On 07/29/2011 07:45 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>>> WHat should the provider be called... "custom" or "yum"?
>>>>
>>>> -- bk
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>> Custom
>>>
>> +1
>>
>> We will eventually support multiple content types per provider.
>>
>
>
> ok.. so which do we want, today the cli has a model which is :
>
> create a provider of type "Yum".
> Add yum repos.
>
> The GUI seems to have a model of
>
> Create a provider of type "Custom"
> Add product which are of type yum
>
> Just need to be consistent. So, where do I put the bug?
>
> -- bk
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
In the UI today, it is correct that the provider type may be of Custom 
or Red Hat.

For a custom provider, when a product is created, there is also a type 
that may be selected for the individual product.  Today, the options are 
File and Yum.  That said, these were placeholders and are not currently 
used by the implementation.