[katello-devel] Package Profile Capture Design Doc

[Pradeep Kilambi]

On 05/26/2011 10:27 AM, jesus m. rodriguez wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2011 10:22 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
>> On 05/26/2011 10:05 AM, Todd B Sanders wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2011 10:00 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
>>>> On 05/26/2011 09:55 AM, jesus m. rodriguez wrote:
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/25/2011 01:40 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
>>>>>> Here is the design/spec document for package profile capture story.
>>>>>> This
>>>>>> will impact both Pulp and Katello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/PackageProfileUpdate
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please lemme know if you guys have further thoughts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> ~ Prad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>>>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>>>> Instead of pulp-client-utils how about calling it Mache.
>>>>> As in Paper Mache which is made from wood pulp.
>>>>> And you can build things with paper mache.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papier-m%C3%A2ch%C3%A9
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my 2 pesos.
>>>>>
>>>>> jesus
>>>> Hehe cool name. Todd what do you think? I'll be filing for a project
>>>> hosting request today. If we can agree on the name, I'll go ahead
>>>> with filing the ticket.
>>>>
>>>> ~ Prad
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>> What am I missing?  Why a separate project for this? .....as this is
>>> just part of the pulp client-side tooling. The reason we are pulling
>>> into a separate rpm is so that is can more easily be leveraged by
>>> additional clients  (i.e. RHSM).
>>>
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>> -Todd
>> We can use it under same pulp project. Since this is a separate tool
>> shared between katello, pulp and RHSM and need to get into brew at some
>> point for RHEL, I was thinking it would be easier if its not tied up
>> with pulp itself. This is a package pulp, ketello/rhsm will require. So
>> might have a case where we want newer builds for this package outside of
>> pulp itself ?
>>
>> ~ Prad
> You have a couple options:
>
> 1) keep it in the same tree as pulp following the pulp release cycle
>
> 2) put it as separate git repo on fedora but link to it from the
>     pulp wiki and mailing list. That's what we did with Thumbslug and
>     Headpin. They are their own repos but linked from the Candelpin wiki.
>
>     This way you get to have a clean repo people can contribute to and
>     maintain it on a separate release schedule if needed.
>
> jesus

Option-2 makes sense to me. I dont think we should bind the release 
cycle of a shared library package with pulp itself.

~ Prad

> - -- 
> jesus m. rodriguez          | jesusr at redhat.com
> principal software engineer | irc: zeus
> red hat systems management  | 919.754.4413 (w)
> rhce # 805008586930012      | 919.623.0080 (c)
> +---------------------------------------------+
> |   "Those who cannot remember the past       |
> |    are condemned to repeat it."             |
> |                        -- George Santayana  |
> +---------------------------------------------+
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk3eY0YACgkQvJZ57YntiYOe4wCgw14/kT1bAZJA3SES5nqv6Lrd
> QlMAoIQQ0Q3+3VZE0Qeq+CwDkLFBZrgw
> =AWbH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----