[katello-devel] Content search shared/unique terminology

[Justin Sherrill]

On 08/01/2012 10:26 AM, Malini Rao wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Rist"<jrist at redhat.com>
> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:16:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Content search shared/unique terminology
>
> On 07/30/2012 02:02 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> In the demo today it was brought up how poor the unique/shared
>> terminology was within content search and how we needed a tipsy tooltip
>> to better explain it, only with better naming.
>>
>> Corey brought up using union and difference instead of unique and shared
>> which i like a lot. Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> I've added the following tipsy in the meantime (please ignore the haml):
>>
>> =_('All:')
>> = _("Show all results regardless of which columns they exist in.")
>> =_('Shared:')
>> = _("Show only results that exist in all selected columns.")
>> =_('Unique:')
>> = _("Show only results not existing in all selected columns.")
> [ Malini ]--->  I suggest a slight modification to the tipsy text - Instead of the word 'columns', I think we should say 'environments'
>
I originally had environments, but there are instances where the columns 
are not environments (like repo comparison).  We might could change the 
tipsy text depending on which view you're in, but that seemed like too 
much work for the payoff.  Thoughts?

>> -Justin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> katello-devel mailing list
>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> I tend to agree with Corey.  Union and Intersection (or difference?) are
> "normal" or accepted means of understanding.
>
>
> [ Malini ]--->   If this is indeed common parlance, then I would suggest a change in the field label -
>
> Instead of "View : All/ Union/ Intersection", use "Content: All/ Union/Intersection"
>
> Otherwise I was going to suggest -
>
> "Content Display: All/ Shared by all / Missing in some"
>