[katello-devel] Renaming of environments: summary

Dmitri Dolguikh dmitri at redhat.com
Tue Aug 14 11:58:32 UTC 2012


On 14/08/12 12:42 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote:
>> My understanding is that this only applies to urls, not
>> yum-metadata. See my example in reply to Mike's email.
>>
> What we need to deal with:
>
> - name of the repo file
> - repository name (the thing between brackets)
> - fancy repository name (name=xyz)
> - URL
>
> That means we somehow need a label. We are currently stripping out all
> non-ASCII characters in our codebase. So we already "generate" labels on
> our own. Therefore its logical to discuss this while we are discussing
> introduction of labels. That's the same thing.
This whole conversation is only about using human-readable piece of 
information in the url. Nothing else.
>
>> Forcing ascii-only characters for user-input in a field that
>> supposed to help users keep track of their stuff in an otherwise
>> localized application, is a terrible, terrible choice (if not a slap
>> in user's face). The bottom line for me is if " *You can't please
>> everyone so aim to displease everyone equally*".
> What we recommend would be pretty seamless and automatic. Labels would
> be pre-defined from (UNICODE) resource names. No need to worry about
> usability, users could totally ignore label field if they are happy with
> the value. But those who do not use latin character set would be more
> than happy to define their own labels to customize (horribly generated)
> URLs in these cases.
What purpose does this serve? In a general case we cannot guarantee 
human-readability of the url. User-facing agents can handle the 
user-friendly bit by showing all kinds of meta-data.

-d
>





More information about the katello-devel mailing list