[katello-devel] Katello-Foreman Integration API Layer Question

[Eric Helms]

To clarify a bit, in Katello today, the ruby bindings (for both Pulp and Candlepin) are tied to Katello code and we are working to change that as we do our Pulp V2 migration work. I.E. create a stand-alone set of ruby-bindings to Pulp that Katello can consume.  But are we doing the same with Foreman?

A good example of what I mean is Funzo's project deadwood for Katello - https://github.com/calfonso/deadwood

 -Eric

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Kearney" <bkearney at redhat.com>
To: katello-devel at redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:03:01 PM
Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Katello-Foreman Integration API Layer Question

On 08/21/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Helms wrote:
> A question after seeing the current progress of the Foreman integration work around the API layer.  This is inspired by some thoughts we've had around the Pulp v2 migrations.
>
> Has any thought been given to generating a separate library/gem/project for the API part?  Since this would be a re-usable component by potentially other communities and present a nice, clean set of ruby bindings for the Foreman APIs that we could consume (as well as others).
>
> - Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>
Yes, this work is resulting in a new /api namespace and new ruby bindings.

-- bk

_______________________________________________
katello-devel mailing list
katello-devel at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel