[katello-devel] Doubts <EoM>

[Tazim Kolhar]

Hi,

   I did use --force open when re-subscribing the systems.
   an received no errors during register/subscribe process.
  
   I did not use subscription-manager clean since I had no idea about it.

Thanks & Regards,
Tazim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Sammons" <esammons at redhat.com>
To: "Tazim Kolhar" <tkolhar at redhat.com>
Cc: katello-devel at redhat.com
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:00:26 PM
Subject: Re: Doubts <EoM>


----- Original Message -----

cc'ing katello-devel here for transparency and they may have some input here.

> Hi,
> 
> 
>    1.   I uploaded a manifests which was valid on one of the servers.
>    2.   the rpm packages installed is as follows :
>         [root at dell-pesc1435-01 ~]# rpm -qa | grep katello
>         katello-all-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-glue-candlepin-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-configure-1.1.3-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-glue-pulp-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
>         katello-selinux-1.0.1-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-cli-headpin-1.1.0-1.git.14.d10e8a3.fc16.noarch
>         katello-glue-foreman-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-cli-common-1.1.1-1.fc16.noarch
>         katello-common-1.0.5-1.fc16.noarch
> 
>    3.   Later, I subscribed few systems to the subscriptions
>    uploaded.
>         
>    4.   Uploaded another manifests created from the same distributor
>    .
>    5.   subscribed the systems again with the new subscriptions.
> 
>    6.   Subscriptions appear to be invalid although they are valid.

For the above, I will try and reproduce as I have not tried this; however, my first question is did you use the --force open when re-subscribing the systems?  Did you receive any errors during the register/subscribe process?  And finally, did you do a subscription-manager clean first (--force I believe will take care of this for you)?

> 
>    7.   Also, when I tried to upload the very first manifest again it
>    failed with errors.

This behavior here is expected as the manifest is in fact older than the manifest you have currently loaded.

>    Please, let me know if its a bug so that can be filed accordingly.
> 
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Tazim

--Eric