[katello-devel] Why do we hide orgs being deleted

[Og Maciel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Sherrill" <jsherril at redhat.com>
> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:43:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Why do we hide orgs being deleted
> 
> For an org in the process of being deleted you wouldn't want to:
> * create permissions based on that org
> * create environments in that org
> * set a users default org to this org
> 
> Probably a few more.

* Be able to re-create the same org while all of its components (repos for instance) were still around...
> 
> Instead of hacking all of those locations (and probably missing a
> few),
> it seemed easier to make a default scope as there were fewer places
> that
> we would want to 'know about' an org being deleted than where we
> would
> want to ignore them.  This did not seem fairly troublesome at the
> time,
> however if it is causing issues, I'm not opposed to changing it.
> 
> There is no orchestration reason for it.
> 
> -Justin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> 

-- 
Og Maciel

Senior QA Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
+1.646.707.7723
irc: omaciel