[katello-devel] Rspec and/or mini-test?

[Lukas Zapletal]

Objection overruled :-)

LZ

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:58:59AM -0400, David Davis wrote:
> Another thing worth considering is that Rspec is by far the most popular Ruby testing framework [1] while TestUnit-style tests are probably more familiar to people outside of Ruby.
> 
> [1] https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/categories/testing_frameworks
> 
> David
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Partha Aji" <paji at redhat.com>
> > To: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap at redhat.com>
> > Cc: katello-devel at redhat.com
> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:44:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Rspec and/or mini-test?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mar 11, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Lukas Zapletal <lzap at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 08:43:06AM -0500, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> > >> Why are we adding a new testing framework? Is it fixing a problem
> > >> in
> > >> the current frameworks?
> > > 
> > > +1
> > > 
> > > If we are going to shift from rspec to minitest-rspec, I dont
> > > really see
> > > any added value, except we will get rid of few test-time
> > > dependencies.
> > +1
> > I like the xUnit syntax too.
> > I would be ok with using just minitest as opposed to minitest:rspec
> > 
> > 
> > Partha
> > 
> > > 
> > > Please again, what is the pain we are trying to solve with this? I
> > > was
> > > under impression we don't like rspec syntax and wan't
> > > straightforward
> > > xunit syntax, but I can see this is not the case.
> > > 
> > > LZ
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Later,
> > > 
> > > Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > katello-devel mailing list
> > katello-devel at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> > 

-- 
Later,

 Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
 #katello #systemengine