Very slow Fedora 22 installation
Roderick Johnstone
rmj at ast.cam.ac.uk
Thu Jun 18 12:24:38 UTC 2015
Hi
Network install with inst.repo=http://ftp.heanet.ie/mirr
ors/fedora/linux/releases/22/Server/x86_64/os
but with 'everything' repo added in kickstart file
Roderick
On 18/06/15 13:16, Mrinmoy Roy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you tell me which .iso are you using for Fedora 22..?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Roderick Johnstone <rmj at ast.cam.ac.uk
> <mailto:rmj at ast.cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm currently running a Fedora 22 kickstart install to one of our
> backup servers. Its been running for nearly a day now!
>
> The root partition is on ext4 but there is a btrfs file system on
> top of md raid6 that holds our user backups. Each users' files are
> rsycned to the btrfs filesystem and then a snapshot made, so there
> are many thousands of snapshots.
>
> Currently the install has been running for nearly a day (the main
> screen is full of dots). Behind the scenes the installer seems to be
> working its way through all the snapshots with messages like this in
> storage.log:
>
> 05:11:42,844 INFO blivet: hiding device existing 9.1 TiB btrfs
> snapshot home_xxx/20130423-000501 (59677) with existing btrfs filesystem
> 05:11:42,848 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB
> 05:11:42,852 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB
> 05:11:42,857 DEBUG blivet: BTRFSVolumeDevice.removeChild: kids:
> 32903 ; name: btrfs.133 ;
> 05:11:42,858 INFO blivet: removed btrfs snapshot
> home_xxx/20130423-000501 (id 59677) from device tree
> 05:11:42,858 DEBUG blivet: lvm filter: adding
> home_xxx/20130423-000501 to the reject list
> 05:11:43,540 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB
>
> In my kickstart file I have a (legacy) line which I use to make sure
> that there is no possibility of the install happening to the wrong
> device:
> ignoredisk --only-use=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST380815AS_9RA8ZRZK
>
> where ata-ST380815AS_9RA8ZRZK is the disk I want to install the
> operating system to.
>
> Is it possible that this is whats causing the slowness?
>
> I guess I could remove the ignoredisk line now since I use the by-id
> name to identify the disk to install to in the 'part' commands. I
> think we introduced 'ignoredisk' ages ago when we had to specify
> partitions by names like /dev/hda1 and I was caught out once when
> the disks were enumerated in a different order in the installer than
> in the previous operating system I was using and the install
> happened to the wrong device.
>
> I'm disinclined to interrupt the install at the moment, as it does
> seem to be making progress, but confirmation that removing the
> 'ignoredisk' line would avoid the issue I described would be useful.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roderick Johnstone
More information about the Kickstart-list
mailing list