[Libguestfs] [PATCH] Allow selinux=? and enforcing=? kernel flags to be controlled

Matthew Booth mbooth at redhat.com
Wed Aug 12 15:32:48 UTC 2009


On 12/08/09 16:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This is a pretty uncontroversial patch which just allows the
> selinux=? and enforcing=? flags on the kernel command line
> to be controlled.
>
> Currently libguestfs unconditionally passes selinux=0.  By default
> this patch does the same thing, but allows programs to enable SELinux
> in the kernel and/or set it to enforcing mode.

Patch looks ok except that we shouldn't include the enforcing flag. I 
can't conceive of any reason we'd want SELinux in enforcing mode in the 
appliance. If selinux=1, then assume enforcing=0.

Matt
-- 
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team

M:       +44 (0)7977 267231
GPG ID:  D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490




More information about the Libguestfs mailing list