[Libguestfs] [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
Jim Meyering
jim at meyering.net
Mon Nov 9 11:24:13 UTC 2009
- Previous message (by thread): [Libguestfs] [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
- Next message (by thread): [Libguestfs] [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've tested all these filesystems here:
>
> http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/filesystem-metadata-overhead/
Nice demo.
...
> Subject: [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
>
> However don't enable OCFS2 by default, because it pulls in about
> 140 extra packages into the appliance.
>
> GFS & GFS2 default to single node (no lock manager etc).
> ---
> appliance/packagelist.in | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> daemon/mkfs.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/appliance/packagelist.in b/appliance/packagelist.in
This looks fine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Libguestfs] [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
- Next message (by thread): [Libguestfs] [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Libguestfs
mailing list