[Libguestfs] [PATCH] run-*-locally: The programs are now virt-[tool], not virt-[tool].pl

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:27:40PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > All the run-*-locally scripts were broken ...
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] run-*-locally: The programs are now virt-[tool], not virt-[tool].pl
> >
> > This fixes commit b488436cc54288fcae8988493749f2e6c87f274c.
> > ---
> >  cat/run-cat-locally             |    2 +-
> >  df/run-df-locally               |    2 +-
> >  edit/run-edit-locally           |    2 +-
> >  inspector/run-inspector-locally |    2 +-
> >  rescue/run-rescue-locally       |    2 +-
> >  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cat/run-cat-locally b/cat/run-cat-locally
> > index be60d07..7c31aaf 100755
> > --- a/cat/run-cat-locally
> > +++ b/cat/run-cat-locally
> > @@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ $ENV{LD_LIBRARY_PATH} = $path.'/src/.libs';
> >  $ENV{LIBGUESTFS_PATH} = $path.'/appliance';
> >  $ENV{PERL5LIB}        = $path.'/perl/blib/lib:'.$path.'/perl/blib/arch';
> >
> > -exec('perl', $path.'/cat/virt-cat.pl', @ARGV);
> > +exec('perl', $path.'/cat/virt-cat', @ARGV);
> 
> ACK.
> Was this provoking failed tests?
> If not, would it be easy to add one or two?

Tricky ...  Of the programs (virt-df, virt-cat, virt-edit,
virt-rescue, virt-inspector), at least two really need a full [Linux]
distribution image in order to test them, so at the moment we don't
test any of them.

These are only for libguestfs developers, so the errors would never
have been seen except by someone who was literally trying to debug
these programs in the source (as I was).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora