[Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] protocol: Trivially implement NBD_CMD_FLAG_DF

Martin Kletzander mkletzan at redhat.com
Mon Apr 1 15:26:12 UTC 2019


On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:14:44AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 4/1/19 10:09 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>
>>>> +++ b/TODO
>>>> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ General ideas for improvements
>>>>    to inform nbdkit when the response is ready:
>>>>    https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00149.html
>>>>
>>>> -* More NBD protocol features.  The only currently missing feature is
>>>> -  online resize.
>>>> +* More NBD protocol features.  The only currently missing features are
>>>> +  sparse reads and online resize.
>>>>
>>
>> This resets the change from commit 26455d452574, probably unintentionally?
>
>The earlier commit had:
>
>-* More NBD protocol features. In the upstream pipeline: proposals for
>-  block status and online resize.
>+* More NBD protocol features.  The only currently missing feature is
>+  online resize.
>
>We implemented block status (which can indirectly be used to avoid the
>need for sparse reads, for the same effect), but we did not actually
>implement sparse reads (where we send FAR less network traffic for
>blocks that are known to read as zeroes). So my change in wording was
>intentional.
>

Oh, thanks for the explanation, I did mistake sparse streams with block status.

>--
>Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
>Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
>Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org
>



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/attachments/20190401/75be6bd0/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libguestfs mailing list