[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] docs: Mention that nbd_close is not thread-safe

Closing the handle in one thread while another thread is locked causes
undefined behavior (as closing does not obtain a lock, and can cause
use-after-free or other nasty problems to the thread that does own the
lock).  However, it is not sensible to try and obtain a lock in
nbd_close, as POSIX says that it is also undefined for any other
thread to wait on a mutex that has already been destroyed.  Therefore,
we don't need to change our code, but merely remind users that
nbd_close is not safe until all other uses of the handle have ceased.

 generator/generator | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/generator/generator b/generator/generator
index 896ad2a..bdd8fd7 100755
--- a/generator/generator
+++ b/generator/generator
@@ -3532,7 +3532,8 @@ for how to get further details of the error.
 Closes the handle and frees any associated resources.  The final
 status of any command that has not been retired (whether by
 C<nbd_aio_command_completed> or by a low-level completion callback
-returning C<1>) is lost.
+returning C<1>) is lost.  This function is not safe to call while
+any other thread is still using any C<nbd_*> API on the same handle.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]