[Libguestfs] nbdkit build failure in Koji

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Mon Aug 3 21:48:54 UTC 2020


On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:21:13PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/1/20 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 08:46:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>One thing I noticed which is a bit odd is:
> >>
> >>$ rm file; for f in {0..1023}; do printf '%1024s' .; done > file; stat -c "%b %B" file
> >>2048 512
> >>$ rm file; for f in {0..1023}; do printf '%1024s' . >> file; done ; stat -c "%b %B" file
> >>3968 512
> >>
> >>The second method is how we currently create the file.  Since looking
> >>through the history there seems to be no reason for that I'm going to
> >>push a commit which changes file creation to the first method, and it
> >>may be slightly faster too.
> >>
> >>However it makes me wonder if the file is not laid out in a single
> >>extent and if that might be causing our problems.  Being only able
> >>to reproduce this on Koji makes a bit tedious to test theories :-(
> >
> >I pushed this patch and did another test build in Koji, but
> >the issue is still not fixed.
> 
> It looks like the real issue at hand is that stat is indeed
> reporting allocated size caused by the filesystem pre-emptively
> over-allocating based on access patterns (more so when creating the
> first file, especially when reopening the file; less so when copying
> as the source file size is now stabilized so the copy has less
> reason to overshoot). But since the real crux of the test is whether
> we managed to punch holes, would it be sufficient to take note of
> the original sizes, and merely check that the resulting size has
> either shrunk (where the file should now be sparser) or remained
> unchanged?
> 
> I'll push a patch along those lines, but as you're the one doing the
> koji runs, there's obviously another feedback cycle to go through.

Sure I'll give your patch a go once I see it in git, thanks!

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top




More information about the Libguestfs mailing list