[Libguestfs] [PATCH virt-v2v 0/3] tests: Add a phony Fedora image for testing

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Thu Jun 9 10:08:18 UTC 2022


On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:58:32AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/09/22 10:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:25:08AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 06/09/22 10:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:02:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>>> On 06/08/22 18:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>>> When we split virt-v2v from libguestfs many moons ago, I copied the
> >>>>> test-data/ subdirectory over.  I didn't modify it much, and it
> >>>>> contains much test data that is irrelevant to virt-v2v.  (This change
> >>>>> does _not_ clean up any of that ...)  However we did use the phony
> >>>>> Windows image (test-data/phony-guests/windows.img) to do a semblance
> >>>>> of testing Windows conversions, or as much as can be done without
> >>>>> having the proprietary operating system itself around.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We never used any of the Linux images, and in fact (before this
> >>>>> change) they could not be used.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah, indeed; for the LUKS-on-LV stuff, I synched
> >>>> "test-data/phony-guests/make-fedora-img.pl" from libguestfs and
> >>>> guestfs-tools (commits 8f2bbc3d50d8 and 27da4b0c4991), but didn't touch
> >>>> virt-v2v's copy. There was no need, and even prior differences existed.
> >>>>
> >>>> ... Indeed, libguestfs commit 0b223a287711 ("test-data: Replace
> >>>> deprecated luks_open with cryptsetup_open.", 2021-05-27) had not been
> >>>> ported to virt-v2v's copy.
> >>>
> >>> It probably makes sense to backport these commits if they apply
> >>> easily.  Can you do that?  I don't think they will conflict with this
> >>> series, but would allow us to test the luks-on-lv case additionally.
> >>
> >> I'm marking this for later in my mailbox.
> > 
> > OK I won't push anything for now.
> 
> I think your series can go in first; I don't expect conflicts due to
> your series. I do expect some navel gazing on my part for the backport
> (or forward port) per se, though... :)

OK, I pushed my series as:

   0d1b2ec1b7..3600f81ec5  master -> master

But I forgot to add the acked/reviewed tags :-(

Thanks!

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html


More information about the Libguestfs mailing list