[Libguestfs] [PATCH nbdkit 5/5] New filter: evil

Eric Blake eblake at redhat.com
Tue May 16 19:41:31 UTC 2023


On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > +
> > > +# If we read subsets they should match the contents of the buffer.
> > > +buf1 = h.pread(1000, 1000)
> > > +assert(buf1 == buf[1000:2000])
> > > +
> > > +buf1 = h.pread(10000, 999)
> > > +assert(buf1 == buf[999:10999])
> > 
> > Should we also assert that there is at least one stuck bit in those
> > two ranges, and/or pick a different or larger range to improve the
> > chances of that being the case?
> 
> So I think you mean pick a range where we know there is a stuck bit
> before doing the read + assert.  I will see.  With a 1:800,000 chance,
> it's not likely the ranges as written would have stuck bits so we're
> comparing zeroes ...

Engineering tradeoffs - we can run a test with a pinned seed to
deterministically know where the stuck bits will be, but it has to be
separate from tests where we want the pseudo-random behavior to differ
between runs but still demonstrate that our approximations are getting
around the ratio of set bits that we expected.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


More information about the Libguestfs mailing list