[Libosinfo] [PATCH 2/4] rhel: Add RHEL 7.0 info

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> > <zeeshanak at gnome.org>wrote:
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 50
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in
> > > index 589f3be..fc844f0 100644
> > > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in
> > > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in
> > > @@ -914,4 +914,54 @@
> > >        <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/>
> > >      </installer>
> > >    </os>
> > > +
> > > +  <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.0">
> > > +    <short-id>rhel7.0</short-id>
> > > +    <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0</_name>
> > > +    <version>7.0</version>
> > > +    <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor>
> > > +    <family>linux</family>
> > > +    <distro>rhel</distro>
> > > +    <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.4"/>
> > >
> > 
> > Should be 6.5, no?
> > 
> > ACK!.
> 
> Should probably not upgrade anything at all, just like rhel 6.0 did not
> upgrade rhel 5.x

Well there *is* an upgrade relationship between them - in place
upgrades are supported by anaconda. So not having that in libosinfo
would be a bug imho

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|