[Libosinfo] [PATCH 4/5] gnome: Add info for gnome-continuous 3.12

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:52:56PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> gnome-continuous is continuous integration system so images produced by
>> it track the git master of all modules and now that GNOME 3.10 is out and
>> many projects have branched for 3.10 maintainance, these images are
>> already 3.12 (3.11 at the moment but thats splitting hair I guess).
>> ---
>>  data/oses/gnome.xml.in | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in
>> index 20b4b6a..41f074c 100644
>> --- a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in
>> +++ b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in
>> @@ -89,4 +89,25 @@
>>      </resources>
>>    </os>
>>
>> +  <os id="http://gnome.org/continuous/3.12">
>> +    <short-id>gnome-continuous-3.12</short-id>
>> +    <_name>GNOME 3.12</_name>
>> +    <version>3.12</version>
>> +    <_vendor>GNOME Project</_vendor>
>> +    <family>linux</family>
>> +    <distro>gnome</distro>
>> +    <derives-from id="http://gnome.org/continuous/3.10"/>
>> +    <upgrades id="http://gnome.org/continuous/3.10"/>
>> +    <is-continuous-snapshot/>
>> +
>> +    <release-date>2014-03-25</release-date>
>
> Imo associating a version number with gnome continuous is weird, especially
> as upstream does not seem to be doing it. We'd need some sort of 'cut-off'
> date instead of a release date I think, to know when gnome-continuous
> stopped tracking 3.10 and started tracking 3.12?

If i understood walters correctly, the cut off date is the release
date (although not so accurate, especially around the time of release)
since gnome-continuous always tracks master.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124