[Libosinfo] [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Sep 10 05:31:48 UTC 2013


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:50AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak at gnome.org>
> 
> While the minimum requirements are specified by F19 docs:
> 
> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview
> 
> I came-up with recommended on my own by simply multiplying the minimum
> requirements by 2.

Was there a significant difference when using these recommended values
rather than the minimum ones? I'm trying to figure out where this patch is
coming from/why it's needed.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20130910/1f2f7004/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libosinfo mailing list