[Libosinfo] Anyone watching the fedorahosted bug tracker?

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Thu Apr 24 15:04:30 UTC 2014


On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:02:42AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 04:26 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any
> > bug that's ever been filed has had a response:
> > 
> > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8
> > 
> > There's at least 3 patches in there as well.
> > 
> > I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default
> > assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker
> > to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*,
> > libguestfs, and virt-manager use.
> > 
> > If so the process would be:
> > 
> > - request the component with bugzilla-requests at redhat.com. they will need
> > default assignee and cc list at least.
> > - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac
> > - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of
> > them are obsolete.
> > - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for
> > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/    (in fact, they can probably disable
> > this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org)
> > 
> 
> So this died a bit. If libosinfo moves to freedesktop.org, it should use their
> bug tracker. But Dan wasn't interested in moving there. I don't really have a
> preference.
> 
> The alternative bits discussed (moving to libvirt.org, etc) are all
> independent of moving the bug tracker. And there was general agreement with
> moving away from trac.
> 
> So unless anyone says otherwise by Saturday, I'll initiate the above steps to
> create the bugzilla.redhat.com tracker and turn off the trac instance. I'll use:
> 
> default assignee: zali at redhat.com
> cc list: berrange at redhat.com, cfergeau at redhat.com

Sounds ok with me.

> Anyone else? And do we want to add the mailing list to CC ?

I don't like having mailing lists on bug CCs, since it is a PITA for
downstream people who just want to participate in the mailing list
without being spammed with bugs

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the Libosinfo mailing list