From zeeshanak at gnome.org Mon Dec 1 17:48:22 2014 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:48:22 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH 2/2] openSUSE: Add OS information for factory images In-Reply-To: <1417270012-29212-2-git-send-email-lasse.schuirmann@gmail.com> References: <1417270012-29212-1-git-send-email-lasse.schuirmann@gmail.com> <1417270012-29212-2-git-send-email-lasse.schuirmann@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Lasse Schuirmann wrote: > --- ACK to both patches and pushed to git master. P.S. Removed redundant (IMO) "OS' from shortlog from both commit logs before pushing. > data/oses/opensuse.xml.in | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/data/oses/opensuse.xml.in b/data/oses/opensuse.xml.in > index fbc0ebf..1c89d00 100644 > --- a/data/oses/opensuse.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/opensuse.xml.in > @@ -491,4 +491,50 @@ > > > > + > + opensuse-factory > + <_name>openSUSE > + factory > + <_vendor>openSUSE > + linux > + opensuse > + > + > + snapshot > + > + > + > + openSUSE-.*-DVD-Snapshot.* > + LINUX > + SUSE LINUX GmbH > + > + boot/i386/loader/linux > + boot/i386/loader/initrd > + > + > + > + openSUSE-.*-DVD-x86_64-Snapshot.* > + LINUX > + SUSE LINUX GmbH > + > + boot/x86_64/loader/linux > + boot/x86_64/loader/initrd > + > + > + > + > + > + 500000000 > + 1 > + 1073741824 > + 3221225472 > + > + > + 2400000000 > + 2147483648 > + 5368709120 > + > + > + > + > > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Libosinfo mailing list > Libosinfo at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ From crobinso at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:24:50 2014 From: crobinso at redhat.com (Cole Robinson) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] oses: Add RHEL Server for AArch64 (rhelsa2.0) Message-ID: Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then it's slated to be its own product. Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson --- data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ data/schemas/libosinfo.rng | 1 + ...ELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in index 791d470..b1e70e0 100644 --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in @@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ + + + rhel-atomic-7.0 <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host 7.0 @@ -1212,4 +1215,52 @@ + + + + + + rhelsa2.0 + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for AArch64 2.0 + 2.0 + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc + linux + rhel + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LINUX + RHELSA-.* Server\.aarch64 + + isolinux/vmlinuz + isolinux/initrd.img + + + + + 1 + 1000000000 + 1073741824 + 10737418240 + + + + 400000000 + 1073741824 + 9663676416 + + + diff --git a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng index e693674..c563a34 100644 --- a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng +++ b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ + aarch64 alpha armv7l cris diff --git a/test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt b/test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f017e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format +System id: LINUX +Volume id: RHELSA-1.5 Server.aarch64 +Volume set id: +Publisher id: +Data preparer id: +Application id: GENISOIMAGE ISO 9660/HFS FILESYSTEM CREATOR (C) 1993 E.YOUNGDALE (C) 1997-2006 J.PEARSON/J.SCHILLING (C) 2006-2007 CDRKIT TEAM +Copyright File id: +Abstract File id: +Bibliographic File id: +Volume set size is: 1 +Volume set sequence number is: 1 +Logical block size is: 2048 +Volume size is: 1417692 +El Torito VD version 1 found, boot catalog is in sector 523 +Joliet with UCS level 3 found +Rock Ridge signatures version 1 found +Eltorito validation header: + Hid 1 + Arch 239 (Unknown Arch) + ID '' + Key 55 AA + Eltorito defaultboot header: + Bootid 88 (bootable) + Boot media 0 (No Emulation Boot) + Load segment 0 + Sys type 0 + Nsect 29E8 + Bootoff 1DED2 122578 -- 2.1.0 From crobinso at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:35:13 2014 From: crobinso at redhat.com (Cole Robinson) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] oses: Add RHEL Server for AArch64 (rhelsa2.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547F1FA1.50203@redhat.com> On 12/03/2014 09:24 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: > Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then > it's slated to be its own product. > This install media isn't publicly available yet, so we can hold off the patch for now. Bits will be available sometime in the next few months IIRC - Cole From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:18:29 2014 From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:18:29 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] oses: Add RHEL Server for AArch64 (rhelsa2.0) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20141203171829.GC11146@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Hey, On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:24:50AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: > Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then > it's slated to be its own product. > > Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson > --- > data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > data/schemas/libosinfo.rng | 1 + > ...ELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > index 791d470..b1e70e0 100644 > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > @@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ > > > > + > + > + > > rhel-atomic-7.0 > <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host 7.0 > @@ -1212,4 +1215,52 @@ > > > > + > + > + > + > + > + rhelsa2.0 > + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for AArch64 2.0 > + 2.0 Just a quick comment, version is 2.0 here but the volume id in the test case is: Volume id: RHELSA-1.5 Server.aarch64 so version is inconsistent, maybe the volume-id regexp needs to be more specific? Christophe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From crobinso at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:20:53 2014 From: crobinso at redhat.com (Cole Robinson) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo] oses: Add RHEL Server for AArch64 (rhelsa2.0) In-Reply-To: <20141203171829.GC11146@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> References: <20141203171829.GC11146@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Message-ID: <547F4675.2030703@redhat.com> On 12/03/2014 12:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:24:50AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then >> it's slated to be its own product. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson >> --- >> data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> data/schemas/libosinfo.rng | 1 + >> ...ELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> index 791d470..b1e70e0 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> @@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ >> >> >> >> + >> + >> + >> >> rhel-atomic-7.0 >> <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host 7.0 >> @@ -1212,4 +1215,52 @@ >> >> >> >> + >> + >> + >> + >> + >> + rhelsa2.0 >> + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for AArch64 2.0 >> + 2.0 > > Just a quick comment, version is 2.0 here but the volume id in the test > case is: > Volume id: RHELSA-1.5 Server.aarch64 > so version is inconsistent, maybe the volume-id regexp needs to be more > specific? > I think 1.5 is just the internal dev version number. Once ISOs surface publicly I'll take another look at this - Cole From rick.2889 at gmail.com Sat Dec 20 20:59:21 2014 From: rick.2889 at gmail.com (Yoshi2889) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 21:59:21 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] Add a Windows 7 CD ID Message-ID: <1419109161-5138-1-git-send-email-rick.2889@gmail.com> --- data/oses/windows.xml.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/data/oses/windows.xml.in b/data/oses/windows.xml.in index 38c8ae6..47d4457 100644 --- a/data/oses/windows.xml.in +++ b/data/oses/windows.xml.in @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ - (GRMCPRFRER)_ + (GRMCPRFRER|GRMCPRFREO)_ MICROSOFT CORPORATION [[:upper:][:digit:]]*_([[:upper:]]*) -- 2.2.1 From cfergeau at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 09:41:28 2014 From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:41:28 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] Add a Windows 7 CD ID In-Reply-To: <1419109161-5138-1-git-send-email-rick.2889@gmail.com> References: <1419109161-5138-1-git-send-email-rick.2889@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20141222094128.GB12050@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Hey, Thanks for the patch! Do you know if this is a Professional, Family, ... edition of Windows or is it unknown? It would be useful if you could provide the output of isoinfo -d -i youriso.iso so that it can be added to the test-suite. Thanks! Christophe On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:59:21PM +0100, Yoshi2889 wrote: > --- > data/oses/windows.xml.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/data/oses/windows.xml.in b/data/oses/windows.xml.in > index 38c8ae6..47d4457 100644 > --- a/data/oses/windows.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/windows.xml.in > @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ > > > > - (GRMCPRFRER)_ > + (GRMCPRFRER|GRMCPRFREO)_ > MICROSOFT CORPORATION > [[:upper:][:digit:]]*_([[:upper:]]*) > > -- > 2.2.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Libosinfo mailing list > Libosinfo at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zeeshanak at gnome.org Mon Dec 22 14:12:48 2014 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:12:48 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] Script broken for Fedora net ISO In-Reply-To: <20141112093501.GG32202@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> References: <20141106102425.GA16843@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> <20141112093501.GG32202@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Message-ID: I had forgotten about this but now I'll have another look into this issue. Fedora guys decided to stop producing full installer ISOs for Workstation and now its a lot more important. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:12:05PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> Hmm.. didn't think of this but as you said, not only it is very >> hackish but would also imply us having to add otherwise redundant >> entries. How about we go for #2? > > Well, even with #2, it will be useful to be able to know before starting > the installation whether internet is required for express install to > work or not, ie you need to detect if an iso is a net install or not. > > As I understand #2, you suggest that applications make sure internet is > available for fedora express installs and set the needed variable even > in cases when it would not be needed. > > Christophe -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ From rick.2889 at gmail.com Fri Dec 19 23:01:50 2014 From: rick.2889 at gmail.com (Yoshi2889) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:01:50 -0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] Add a Windows 7 CD ID Message-ID: <1419030106-16853-1-git-send-email-rick.2889@gmail.com> --- data/oses/windows.xml.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/data/oses/windows.xml.in b/data/oses/windows.xml.in index 38c8ae6..47d4457 100644 --- a/data/oses/windows.xml.in +++ b/data/oses/windows.xml.in @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ - (GRMCPRFRER)_ + (GRMCPRFRER|GRMCPRFREO)_ MICROSOFT CORPORATION [[:upper:][:digit:]]*_([[:upper:]]*) -- 2.2.0