[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Libosinfo] [PATCH libosinfo 2/3] Add CentOS 7.0



Hey,


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
Hey,

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan redhat com>
> ---
>  data/oses/centos.xml.in                            | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt   | 29 ++++++++++++++++
>  .../CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-Everything.iso.txt      | 29 ++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 test/isodata/centos/centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso.txt
>  create mode 100644 test/isodata/centos/centos7.0/CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-Everything.iso.txt
>
> diff --git a/data/oses/centos.xml.in b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> index 7f53bb4..3c79918 100644
> --- a/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> +++ b/data/oses/centos.xml.in
> @@ -277,4 +277,44 @@
>      </installer>
>    </os>
>
> +  <os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0">
> +    <short-id>centos7.0</short-id>
> +    <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name>
> +    <version>7.0</version>

This bit is slightly inaccurate,
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-July/020393.html
says:
« This is the first release for CentOS-7 and is version marked as
7.0-1406 »

We should at least reflect this in the <version> field, and maybe in the
<name> too.

Hmm. I disagree.
Are we adding new entries for every 7.0-x release?
 

Christophe

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo




--
Fabiano Fidêncio

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]