[Libosinfo] [PATCH] Add xen-3.1.0 missing entry

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Christophe Fergeau
<cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> A few products derive from xen-3.1.0 but we had no entry for the
>> hypervisor till now.
>> ---
>>  data/hypervisors/xen.xml.in | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/data/hypervisors/xen.xml.in b/data/hypervisors/xen.xml.in
>> index 98efefb..be23796 100644
>> --- a/data/hypervisors/xen.xml.in
>> +++ b/data/hypervisors/xen.xml.in
>> @@ -43,12 +43,27 @@
>>      </devices>
>>    </platform>
>>
>> +  <platform id="http://xen.org/xen/3.1.0">
>> +    <short-id>xen-3.1.0</short-id>
>> +    <_name>Xen 3.1.0</_name>
>> +    <_vendor>Citrix Systems, Inc.</_vendor>
>> +    <version>3.1.0</version>
>> +    <upgrades id="http://xen.org/xen/3.0.4"/>
>> +
>> +    <devices>
>> +      <device id="http://xen.org/devices/block"/>
>> +      <device id="http://xen.org/devices/net"/>
>> +      <device id="http://xen.org/devices/console"/>
>> +      <device id="http://xen.org/devices/framebuffer"/>
>> +    </devices>
>> +  </platform>
>> +
>
> Iirc the devices are inherited so we don't need to have them with every
> entry (they were present already in older xen entries).
> ACK.

Are they? Are you sure? It is a bit weird to me, just thinking that
devices can become obsoletes and as they are inherited we can end up
having really old/not supported anymore devices from the very first
versions.
If they really are, I'll go for this patch as it is for now and then
clean up the possible duplicated entries in the rest of the project.

>
> Christophe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
>


Best Regards,
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio