From zeeshanak at gnome.org Wed Feb 4 15:08:07 2015 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:08:07 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel,script: Don't specify interface Message-ID: <1423062487-654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Its not guaranteed that we'll have 'eth0' available or that it will be named 'eth0' by kernel. Since kickstart allows us not to specify the name of the interface, lets omit that and let kickstart choose the best device for us. This change has only been tested against RHEL 7.0. Would probably be best to test against 6.x too. --- data/install-scripts/rhel.xml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml index 097bd04..efe91e5 100644 --- a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml +++ b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ text keyboard us lang skipx -network --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp +network --bootproto dhcp rootpw firewall --disabled authconfig --enableshadow --enablemd5 @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ install cdrom keyboard us lang -network --onboot yes --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp --noipv6 --hostname= +network --onboot yes --bootproto dhcp --noipv6 --hostname= rootpw dummyPa55w0rd # Actual password set (or unset) in %post below firewall --disabled authconfig --enableshadow --enablemd5 -- 2.1.0 From cfergeau at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:30:16 2015 From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:30:16 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel,script: Don't specify interface In-Reply-To: <1423062487-654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> References: <1423062487-654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Message-ID: <20150205083016.GB26781@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Hey Zeeshan, On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:08:07PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Its not guaranteed that we'll have 'eth0' available or that it will be > named 'eth0' by kernel. Since kickstart allows us not to specify the > name of the interface, lets omit that and let kickstart choose the best > device for us. > > This change has only been tested against RHEL 7.0. Would probably be > best to test against 6.x too. Yeah, it would be great if you could test against rhel6 as if there is breakage, I expect it to happen there. Christophe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zeeshanak at gnome.org Wed Feb 11 13:50:08 2015 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:50:08 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] script, rhel: Specify boot partition size for < 7 Message-ID: <1423662608-12206-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Seems even RHEL 6.6 Anaconda can't handle the --recommended option of part command so lets not use that unless its RHEL >= 7. --- data/install-scripts/rhel.xml | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml index efe91e5..f22e6c6 100644 --- a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml +++ b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml @@ -72,7 +72,15 @@ zerombr clearpart --all --drives= + + + +part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=500 --ondisk= + + part /boot --fstype ext4 --recommended --ondisk= + + part pv.2 --size=1 --grow --ondisk= volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.2 logvol swap --fstype swap --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=768 --grow --maxsize=1536 @@ -174,7 +182,14 @@ clearpart --all --drives= firstboot --disable + + +part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=500 --ondisk= + + part /boot --fstype ext4 --recommended --ondisk= + + part pv.2 --size=1 --grow --ondisk= volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.2 logvol swap --fstype swap --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=768 --grow --maxsize=1536 -- 2.1.0 From zeeshanak at gnome.org Wed Feb 11 13:51:13 2015 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:51:13 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel,script: Don't specify interface In-Reply-To: <20150205083016.GB26781@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> References: <1423062487-654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> <20150205083016.GB26781@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hey Zeeshan, > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:08:07PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> Its not guaranteed that we'll have 'eth0' available or that it will be >> named 'eth0' by kernel. Since kickstart allows us not to specify the >> name of the interface, lets omit that and let kickstart choose the best >> device for us. >> >> This change has only been tested against RHEL 7.0. Would probably be >> best to test against 6.x too. > > Yeah, it would be great if you could test against rhel6 as if there is > breakage, I expect it to happen there. I tested against 6.6 and installer worked fine. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 14:34:35 2015 From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:34:35 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] script, rhel: Specify boot partition size for < 7 In-Reply-To: <1423662608-12206-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> References: <1423662608-12206-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Message-ID: <20150211143435.GO11805@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:50:08PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Seems even RHEL 6.6 Anaconda can't handle the --recommended option of > part command so lets not use that unless its RHEL >= 7. > --- > data/install-scripts/rhel.xml | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml > index efe91e5..f22e6c6 100644 > --- a/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml > +++ b/data/install-scripts/rhel.xml > @@ -72,7 +72,15 @@ zerombr > > clearpart --all --drives= > > + > + > + > +part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=500 --ondisk= 500MB might be a bit small for /boot (I think I have a machine with 500MB /boot which is starting to get full) ACK with 500 or with something bigger Christophe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cfergeau at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 14:34:58 2015 From: cfergeau at redhat.com (Christophe Fergeau) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:34:58 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] rhel,script: Don't specify interface In-Reply-To: References: <1423062487-654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> <20150205083016.GB26781@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20150211143458.GP11805@edamame.cdg.redhat.com> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:51:13PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > Hey Zeeshan, > > > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:08:07PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> Its not guaranteed that we'll have 'eth0' available or that it will be > >> named 'eth0' by kernel. Since kickstart allows us not to specify the > >> name of the interface, lets omit that and let kickstart choose the best > >> device for us. > >> > >> This change has only been tested against RHEL 7.0. Would probably be > >> best to test against 6.x too. > > > > Yeah, it would be great if you could test against rhel6 as if there is > > breakage, I expect it to happen there. > > I tested against 6.6 and installer worked fine. Great, thanks a lot for the testing, ACK. Christophe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zeeshanak at gnome.org Fri Feb 27 15:50:03 2015 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:50:03 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] gnome: Add entry for 3.14 Message-ID: <1425052203-24654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> --- data/oses/gnome.xml.in | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in index 3e2be0f..b9acf3c 100644 --- a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in +++ b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in @@ -108,4 +108,23 @@ + + gnome-continuous-3.14 + <_name>GNOME 3.14 + 3.14 + <_vendor>GNOME Project + linux + gnome + + + snapshot + + + + 2 + 1073741824 + + + + -- 2.1.0 From fabiano at fidencio.org Fri Feb 27 18:14:03 2015 From: fabiano at fidencio.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Fabiano_Fid=C3=AAncio?=) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:14:03 +0100 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] gnome: Add entry for 3.14 In-Reply-To: <1425052203-24654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> References: <1425052203-24654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Message-ID: On Feb 27, 2015 4:50 PM, "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" wrote: > > --- > data/oses/gnome.xml.in | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in > index 3e2be0f..b9acf3c 100644 > --- a/data/oses/gnome.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/gnome.xml.in > @@ -108,4 +108,23 @@ > > > > + > + gnome-continuous-3.14 > + <_name>GNOME 3.14 > + 3.14 > + <_vendor>GNOME Project > + linux > + gnome > + > + > + snapshot > + > + > + > + 2 > + 1073741824 > + > + > + > + > > -- > 2.1.0 > > Ack. May I ask you why are you just adding it now? Is this 1 cycle delay something normal? I would expect to see a 3.16 entry soon. Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fid?ncio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zeeshanak at gnome.org Fri Feb 27 18:57:32 2015 From: zeeshanak at gnome.org (Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:57:32 +0000 Subject: [Libosinfo] [PATCH] gnome: Add entry for 3.14 In-Reply-To: References: <1425052203-24654-1-git-send-email-zeeshanak@gnome.org> Message-ID: > Ack. > May I ask you why are you just adding it now? Is this 1 cycle delay > something normal? I would expect to see a 3.16 entry soon. No, its just that i didn't think of it. :( -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/